Ceramic Coating 2024 Test: Which Brand Wins?
2024 test8 productsCar Care & Detailing

Ceramic Coating 2024 Test: Which Brand Wins?

In our 2024 test we compared 8 ceramic coating options head to head. Adam's came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.

The verdict
Adam's
Winner

Adam's

Price shown in test: $150, the most expensive coating tested

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Nano Bond
Runner-up

Nano Bond

Price shown in test: $38

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Hybrid Solutions
Budget pick

Hybrid Solutions

Price shown in test: $15

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The quick take

The short version of why each pick lands where it does, built straight from the measured results.

WinnerAdam's$150, the most expensive coating tested

So, which ceramic coating is the best? And the Adam's totally dominated the showdown finishing in first place.

Runner-upNano Bond$38

Best in 1 of 2 measurements, including Final slickness.

Budget pickHybrid Solutions$15

Best in 1 of 2 measurements, including Slickness fresh.

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.

Claims

  • 1Adam's

    kit includes surface prep, graphene boost, and coating, plus applicators and microsuede/plush towels; claims 9 years of protection, 10H hardness, extremely hydrophobic, and 110% satisfaction

  • 2Nano Bond

    includes sponge, microfiber towel, microsuede applicator, and gloves; claims outstanding water beading and up to 36 months of protection

  • 3Hybrid Solutions

    claims extreme water repellency and long-lasting protection over 6 months

  • 4Cerakote

    claims unsurpassed slickness and to be extremely hydrophobic; cures in about 2 hours

  • 5Chemical Guys

    manufacturer claims extreme hyperactive water beading and protection against UV rays, extreme weather, and contamination

  • 6Shine Armor

    claims to offer a waterless coat and shine, includes two microfiber towels

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro

    kit includes a 16 oz spray bottle, 2 oz travel bottle, and two microfiber towels; claims to be the most advanced water-based ceramic coating; supposed to last up to 12 months

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    claims to last up to 10 years, includes two microfiber towels and a couple pairs of gloves

Slickness fresh

  • 1Adam's
    1.7 lb

    of force to slide the sponge

  • 2Nano Bond
    3.3 lb

    not nearly as slick as the spray-on products

  • 3Hybrid Solutions
    1.5 lb1st

    finished in first place in this round

  • 4Cerakote
    2 lb2nd

    moved into second place at that point in the sequence

  • 5Chemical Guys
    1.6 lb2nd

    moved into second place at that point, only a tenth of a pound behind Hybrid Solutions

  • 6Shine Armor
    2.4 lb

    quite a bit better than bare paint

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro
    2 lb

    same as Cerakote

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    not stated in the transcript; the fresh-slickness recap names Shine Armor, Hybrid Solutions, Cerakote, Chemical Guys, Nanobond, F-11, and Adam's but omits an Advanced Graphene figure

Strip wash

  • 1Adam's

    by far the best yet, not even close to the runner up, a definitive win

  • 2Nano Bond

    still performing very well, water forming beads across the entire test area

  • 3Hybrid Solutions

    continues to demonstrate excellent hydrophobic qualities, performing well

  • 4Cerakote

    performing very well, doing a little better than Chemical Guys with a tighter water bead

  • 5Chemical Guys

    water beading nicely, though Cerakote did a little better; water beginning to form a sheet

  • 6Shine Armor

    pretty much destroyed the coating, a solid sheet of water formed with only a light spray

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro

    forming mostly a sheet across the test area, Nano Bond performed quite a bit better

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    still performing well though water began sheeting in some areas; better than the F11

Iron remover

  • 1Adam's

    still performing just as good as new with nothing but water beads

  • 2Nano Bond

    holding up the best so far, water forming mostly beads

  • 3Hybrid Solutions

    still performing well though the iron remover had an impact; held up a little better than Cerakote

  • 4Cerakote

    performing well, though Hybrid Solutions held up slightly better

  • 5Chemical Guys

    almost as good as Cerakote

  • 6Shine Armor

    really disarmed its protection, almost used up

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro

    still offering a little protection but water mostly forming a sheet

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    still trailing Hybrid Solutions, Cerakote, and Chemical Guys

Bug and tar remover

  • 1Adam's

    still looks as good as new with only water beads, even under heavy spray; remained on top without water forming a sheet

  • 2Nano Bond

    performing even better than Hybrid Solutions, clearing in only 4 seconds; final summary places it second in this round at 4 seconds

  • 3Hybrid Solutions

    damage occurred but water still beaded; took 15 seconds for the water sheet to dissipate

  • 4Cerakote

    seemed to take more damage than Hybrid Solutions; needed a full minute for the water to dissipate

  • 5Chemical Guys

    experienced a lot of damage, a sheet of water formed quickly, needed a full minute to dissipate

  • 6Shine Armor

    completely used up, no protection left

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro

    appeared completely used up

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    water quickly formed a sheet under a light spray; took close to 45 seconds for the sheet to dissipate

Final slickness

  • 1Adam's
    2.1 lb

    taking the lead from the Nano Bond

  • 2Nano Bond
    2.4 lb

    the best so far before Adam's was retested at 2.1 lb

  • 3Hybrid Solutions
    3.5 lb

    performed just a little better than Shine Armor's 3.7 lb

  • 4Cerakote
    3.8 lb

    same as Chemical Guys

  • 5Chemical Guys
    3.8 lb

    same as Cerakote

  • 6Shine Armor
    3.7 lb

    up from 2.1 lb when fresh

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro
    3.2 lb
  • 8Advanced Graphene
    3.1 lb

Final warm/hot water exposure

  • 1Adam's

    water is not able to form a sheet, came out on top for warm and hot water exposure

  • 2Nano Bond

    small sheet formed and cleared in 3 seconds, the fastest yet at that point, finishing second behind Adam's

  • 3Hybrid Solutions

    a much smaller sheet formed and cleared in only 4 seconds

  • 4Cerakote

    performed very close to Hybrid Solutions, water dissipated in close to 5 seconds

  • 5Chemical Guys

    sheet of water cleared up in about 7 seconds

  • 6Shine Armor

    took its toll, about 13 seconds for the water sheet to dissipate

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro

    a larger sheet of water formed, took 7 seconds to clear

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    performed about the same as the F-11, around 7 seconds

Wheel and tire cleaner

  • 1Adam's

    performing by far the best so far, mostly water beading

  • 2Nano Bond

    performing the best so far, water unable to form a sheet over the entire test area

  • 3Hybrid Solutions

    water forming a sheet, pretty much used up

  • 4Cerakote

    used up, a sheet of water covering the entire test area

  • 5Chemical Guys

    chemicals definitely took their toll

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    pretty much used up

  • 6Shine Armor
    not tested
  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro
    not tested
All measurements (4 more)+

Beading mid-video assessment

  • 1Adam's

    came out on top in this round

  • 2Nano Bond

    performed well, finished in second place behind Adam's

  • 3Hybrid Solutions

    tied for third place with Cerakote

  • 4Cerakote

    tied for third place with Hybrid Solutions; too close to call against Hybrid Solutions; performed better than Chemical Guys in a side by side

  • 5Chemical Guys

    looked really good, but Hybrid Solutions and Cerakote may have been a little better

  • 6Shine Armor
    not tested
  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro
    not tested
  • 8Advanced Graphene
    not tested

Degreaser

  • 1Adam's

    still doing a great job, only a small water sheet formed and cleared in about a second, a clear win over Nano Bond

  • 2Nano Bond

    experienced quite a bit of damage but was still providing protection, taking 15 seconds for the water sheet to clear versus about a second for Adam's, a win for Adam's

  • 6Shine Armor

    one of the first four spray-and-wipe coatings, appeared completely used up

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro

    pretty much used up

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    pretty much used up

  • 3Hybrid Solutions
    not tested
  • 4Cerakote
    not tested
  • 5Chemical Guys
    not tested

Beading (polycarbonate)

  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro

    most of the water beaded but there was more sheeting compared to most other brands; performed worse than Nano Bond in a side by side

  • 8Advanced Graphene

    performed better than the F11 but not quite as well as Hybrid Solutions and Cerakote; won a side by side against the F11 when its water sheet cleared faster

  • 1Adam's
    not tested
  • 2Nano Bond
    not tested
  • 3Hybrid Solutions
    not tested
  • 4Cerakote
    not tested
  • 5Chemical Guys
    not tested
  • 6Shine Armor
    not tested

Baseline (bare paint)

  • 6Shine Armor

    unprotected paint took 4.5 lb of force for the sponge to slide

  • 1Adam's
    not tested
  • 2Nano Bond
    not tested
  • 3Hybrid Solutions
    not tested
  • 4Cerakote
    not tested
  • 5Chemical Guys
    not tested
  • 7TopCoat F-11 Pro
    not tested
  • 8Advanced Graphene
    not tested

How it was tested

  • baseline unprotected paint slickness using a 5 lb weighted sponge, force in lb to slide
  • fresh-coating slickness with the same sponge test after full cure
  • polycarbonate headlight-panel slickness and water beading, including simulated warm and hot water dishwasher exposure around 120F
  • visual water beading and sheeting assessment on the coated hood before chemical exposure
  • resistance to Strip Wash (a strong car wash soap)
  • resistance to iron remover
  • resistance to Bug and Tar Remover, with timed water-sheet dissipation
  • resistance to wheel and tire cleaner
  • resistance to degreaser, the toughest chemical test, narrowed to the top two finishers
  • final slickness re-test and timed water-sheet dissipation after roughly 4.5 hours of combined warm and hot water spray exposure

So, which ceramic coating is the best? And the Adam's totally dominated the showdown finishing in first place.

From the test video verdict.

More Car Care & Detailing