Which Corded Vs Cordless Power Tools Brand Wins?

This video is a corded-vs-cordless myth-test spanning FIVE separate tool categories, each its own corded/cordless pair of the SAME brand (Makita circular saw, DeWalt angle grinder, DeWalt hammer drill, Milwaukee reciprocating saw, Ridgid oscillating multi-tool). There is no single overall brand winner; each category has its own local verdict (see product notes), so winner/runnerUp/budgetPick are left null per the per-use-case-favorites rule. Overall closing takeaway from the narrator: cordless tools typically cost more (especially with battery included) but are quieter, vibrate less, and stop faster; corded tools with 10-amp-or-larger motors (circular saw, angle grinder, both reciprocating saws) match or beat cordless on raw work speed, except the drill category where cordless's 3-speed gearbox gave it a clear, explicit win. Flagged ambiguities kept verbatim rather than resolved: (1) a noise-dB sentence pair in the reciprocating saw section literally labels both readings 'corded'; resolved by testing-order pattern to a likely cordless/corded split but not silently corrected. (2) A drill torque sentence ('175 in lb for the corded drill... In third gear, the DeWalt made 152 in lb') has ambiguous attribution between the corded and cordless drill's third gear. (3) A retest of a separately introduced, personally-owned '12 amp Milwaukee corded saw' gives 16.22 seconds at 20 lb, wildly different from the 5.77-second figure for the same weight class earlier for the tested Super Sawzall; both kept, not reconciled. Build note: this video is a strong candidate to be split into five separate corded-vs-cordless category pages given the five distinct tool categories and per-category verdicts.