Which Doorbell Camera Brand Wins?
2025 test11 productsGadgets & Tech

Which Doorbell Camera Brand Wins?

This head-to-head test of 11 doorbell camera options has the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.

The verdict
Ranked first

EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)

Price shown in test: $170, most expensive product tested

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The quick take

No single winner was declared in this test. Here is where the top-ranked pick landed, straight from the measured results.

Ranked firstEUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)$170, most expensive product tested

Best in 1 of 4 measurements, including Wifi Router Range.

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.

Spec

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)

    dual cameras, 2K full HD, claimed color night vision clear up to 16 ft, no monthly fees, made in China; did not include a doorbell chime

  • 2REOLINK

    claimed full 2K, 150 by 150 degree head-to-toe view, works with 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, person/vehicle/package detection, two-way talk, no monthly fees, up to 256GB micro SD support, made in China

  • 3AOSU

    claimed 5 megapixel ultra HD, no monthly fee, 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, battery or wired power, works with Alexa and Google Assistant, built-in 8GB memory card, made in China

  • 4ieGeek

    claimed 1080p FHD video, wireless, comes with a chime, PIR motion detection, works with Alexa, no subscription required, multiple security protections, micro SD local storage, made in China

  • 5XTU

    claimed no subscription required, 2K video, chime included, two-way audio, human detection, night vision, works with Alexa and Google Assistant, indoor/outdoor use, claimed 120 degree wide-angle lens, claimed night vision illuminates up to 33 ft, made in China

  • 6Energizer

    claimed smart 2K doorbell and chime, rechargeable battery, two-way audio, night vision, cloud and card recording, remote access app, made in China

  • 7Wyze

    dual-cam video doorbell, chime included, battery powered, 2K full HD, two-way audio, color night vision, two cameras (people and package), no monthly fee, micro SD storage, 1 minute install, dual-band Wi-Fi, made in China

  • 8Ring

    claimed head-to-toe HD video, motion detection and alerts, two-way talk, quick-release battery pack, up to 180 days of video storage (requires a subscription to actually record video), made in Vietnam

  • 9GridTera

    claimed AI, human detection, instant alerts, night vision, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only, two-way audio, battery powered, made in China

  • 10Blink

    claimed 2 year battery life, two-way audio, HD video, motion and chime, app alerts, Alexa enabled, wired or wire-free option, comes with batteries, made in Malaysia

  • 11Tapo

    wireless doorbell camera with chime included, claimed 2K with full-color night vision, no monthly fee, 160 degree wide-angle view, free AI detection, local storage, phone-call door answering, made in Vietnam

Daytime Distance Test

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)
    30 ft

    sign readable, license plate not readable until about 15 ft; dual camera captures the subject from head to toe

  • 2REOLINK
    35 ft

    marker barely readable, license plate readable at about 15 ft; the only one of the 5 'distance' cameras that can provide a full head-to-toe view of the person standing directly in front of the doorbell, and also captures the package on the ground

  • 3AOSU
    40 ft

    marker readable, license plate readable at 35 ft (one of only 4 cameras that could read the 40 ft marker); subject visible on both sides of the camera, though feet and the package are out of view

  • 4ieGeek

    described as by far the best quality video up to that point in the test order; 40 ft marker very easy to read, license plate readable at 35 ft; subject's face partially out of view when standing to the side

  • 5XTU

    very good quality video, 40 ft marker easy to read, license plate readable at 35 ft; subject's face partially out of view when standing directly in front or to either side; package out of view

  • 6Energizer

    great image quality, 40 ft marker easy to read, license plate barely readable at 35 ft; better vertical field of view than ieGeek and XTU; sees the subject in front of the camera but not to either side

  • 7Wyze

    not designed for high-quality distance video: 25 ft marker readable but license plate not readable until about 10 ft; first camera in the video able to see both the package and the subject head to toe simultaneously thanks to the dual-camera design, though the video lags somewhat

  • 8Ring

    pretty blurry, 30 ft marker barely readable, license plate readable at 10 ft; offers great coverage including the package and a head-to-toe view of the subject

  • 9GridTera
    40 ft

    image very blurry, 25 ft marker barely readable but the license plate is not; license plate finally readable at 10 ft; package out of the camera's field of view

  • 10Blink
    25 ft

    marker readable but 30 ft is not; license plate readable at 15 ft, 5 ft better than GridTera; package out of view, but offers a much wider field of view showing the subject on both sides of the camera

  • 11Tapo
    30 ft

    marker readable but the license plate isn't readable until about 15 ft; described as doing by far the best job up to that point in the test order of keeping the visitor in the field of view; package not visible until picked up

Night Vision Test

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)

    motion detector triggered at about 20 ft out; 15 ft marker readable but a little fuzzy; blinded by the flashlight but not as badly as some other cameras

  • 2REOLINK

    night vision described as not nearly as good as some other brands, but the 20 ft marker is readable; motion sensor triggered at about 12-13 ft away; mostly blinded by the flashlight, but performed better than some other brands

  • 3AOSU

    motion detector triggered at about 15 ft out; pretty good night vision after manual power-on, 40 ft marker readable (named among the best for distance night video, with ieGeek and Energizer); blinded by the flashlight but not as badly as some other cameras

  • 4ieGeek

    great night vision, 40 ft marker readable (named among the best for distance night video, with Energizer and AOSU); did not detect the subject's face until about 5 ft away; completely blinded by the flashlight

  • 5XTU

    very grainy but the 35 ft marker is readable; auto-detect did not discover the subject until about 5 ft away; overall video quality described as the best yet up to that point in the test order; completely blinded by the flashlight

  • 6Energizer

    able to provide a readable 40 ft marker image at night (named among the best for distance night video, with ieGeek and AOSU); motion detector did not discover the subject until about 10 ft out; experienced pretty bad flashlight blinding, similar to Tapo

  • 7Wyze

    doesn't offer a lot of night range, 20 ft marker readable; motion sensor triggered at about 10 ft away; blinded by the flashlight but not as badly as some other cameras

  • 8Ring

    not nearly as good as AOSU's, 20 ft marker fuzzy and barely readable; motion sensor triggered close to the 15 ft marker; blinded by the flashlight but not quite as badly as some other brands

  • 9GridTera

    did not detect motion automatically and had to be manually activated; struggled badly, only the 10 ft marker is visible, though it did produce a decent close-up night recording; described as completely blinded by the flashlight, apparently the worst blinding result of all cameras since several other brands are later described as blinded 'but not as badly as the Grid Terra'

  • 10Blink

    detected motion at close to the 20 ft marker, the best (farthest) motion-detection trigger distance of all 13 cameras per the closing recap, though the resulting video quality was very poor and the 10 ft marker was blurry; blinded by the flashlight but not as badly as GridTerra

  • 11Tapo

    powered on manually, 15 ft marker pretty blurry; auto-detect did not discover the subject until she was right in front of the door, the weakest motion-detection distance recorded up to that point; blinded by the flashlight just as badly as the previous brands

Chime Test

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)

    did not include a doorbell chime, so no loudness or range figures apply; the narrator states chimes for this brand and the Blink could not be acquired in time to test range

  • 2REOLINK
    79.1 dB3rd

    on the highest setting (third loudest of all 13); chime signal range not given an individual figure beyond the closing recap naming Tapo and Ring as the two brands with 'terrific' 300 ft chime range

  • 3AOSU
    75.5 dB

    on the highest volume setting

  • 4ieGeek
    74.9 dB
  • 5XTU
    78.7 dB

    the loudest of the first four brands introduced (later exceeded by Tapo, Reolink, and Wyze)

  • 6Energizer
    72.2 dB

    described as not very loud

  • 7Wyze
    92.6 dB

    on the highest setting, by far the loudest of all 13 products

  • 8Ring
    74.4 dB

    chime range named (with Tapo) as one of the two best at 300 ft through two walls

  • 9GridTera
    77.3 dB
  • 10Blink

    did not come with a doorbell alarm/chime, so no loudness figure applies; chime range also could not be tested since a chime for this brand could not be acquired in time

  • 11Tapo
    83.3 dB2nd

    on the highest setting, second loudest of all 13; chime range named (with Ring) as one of the two best at 300 ft through two walls

App Notes

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)

    described as 'a great application': shows both camera views, event/package counts with AI highlighting, record/screenshot/call/quick-reply/mute/spotlight controls, one-camera-at-a-time zoom (unlike Wyze's independent dual-camera zoom), easy playback, settings include power management, delivery guard, facial recognition, customizable activity zones, HDR and streaming-quality control, and a notifications tab

  • 3AOSU

    nice app: live view options include disabling audio, changing stream resolution, recording, screenshot, mic, quick reply; easy-to-filter playback; settings include customizable detection zones, notifications, sensitivity, and facial recognition; subscription costs between $4.50 and $9 per month (event recording, cloud storage, categorization, human detection)

  • 4ieGeek

    essentially the same app as XTU with different branding/colors; many features available without a subscription (recording, screenshot, resolution change, siren, motion detection, mic with multiple voice options); detailed settings (detection sensitivity, power modes, recording settings); nice activity zones and timeline-scroll playback; subscription costs $3.99 per month for cloud storage and AI features

  • 5XTU

    essentially the same app as ieGeek with different branding/colors

  • 6Energizer

    pretty basic and looks outdated, but has screen record, call, screenshot, and motion-sensitivity customization; basic activity zone; subscription costs $3 per month (event recording for the past 7 days)

  • 7Wyze

    pretty simple app; two independent camera views each independently zoomable; audio/mic toggle; photo, record, siren, and quick-response options; scrollable recent-events list; settings include detection sensitivity, zones, and VoIP; 60 days of cloud storage costs $26 per month

  • 8Ring

    very simple app that does a lot: live view auto-records, mic/audio toggle, quick reply, full screen; simple playback with scroll, calendar day-select, event search, and share; settings include motion sensitivity, activity zones, and notification customization

  • 9GridTera

    very basic app: live view controls limited to volume, mic, screen orientation, video resolution, and screenshot; settings include a human-detection accuracy threshold and a detection zone; subscription costs around $100 per year or $29 for 6 months

  • 10Blink

    a solid application for the price, though it takes the longest to load of all the brands even with a strong Wi-Fi connection; live-view recording and saving is only available with a subscription plan ($3 per month); has a mic button, full-screen option, activity zones, and an easy-to-filter playback feature

  • 11Tapo

    easy to use with a lot of functionality: talk, privacy mode, quick responses, light tag mode, resolution change, recording, calling, multi-camera view; nice timeline/day-switch playback; activity zones with good customization; subscription costs $3.50 per month (30 days cloud storage, enhanced notifications, video summary, weekly reports)

  • 2REOLINK
    not tested

Field Of View Degrees

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)
    166 degrees

    (fisheye lens, tied with AOSU and Ring for widest of all 13)

  • 2REOLINK
    150 degrees

    (fisheye lens)

  • 3AOSU
    166 degrees
  • 8Ring
    approximately166 degrees

    (same as AOSU)

  • 11Tapo
    160 degrees

    at the cost of video quality per the narrator

  • 4ieGeek
    not tested
  • 5XTU
    not tested
  • 6Energizer
    not tested
  • 7Wyze
    not tested
  • 9GridTera
    not tested
  • 10Blink
    not tested
All measurements (3 more)+

Flashlight Blinding Rating

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)

    tied with Ring for the best (least-blinded) rating of 3 on the subjective flashlight-resistance scale

  • 8Ring

    tied with EUFY for the best (least-blinded) rating of 3 on the subjective flashlight-resistance scale

  • 2REOLINK
    not tested
  • 3AOSU
    not tested
  • 4ieGeek
    not tested
  • 5XTU
    not tested
  • 6Energizer
    not tested
  • 7Wyze
    not tested
  • 9GridTera
    not tested
  • 10Blink
    not tested
  • 11Tapo
    not tested

Overall Nighttime Video Quality

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)

    tied with AOSU for the best possible subjective rating of 2

  • 3AOSU

    tied with EUFY for the best possible subjective rating of 2

  • 2REOLINK
    not tested
  • 4ieGeek
    not tested
  • 5XTU
    not tested
  • 6Energizer
    not tested
  • 7Wyze
    not tested
  • 8Ring
    not tested
  • 9GridTera
    not tested
  • 10Blink
    not tested
  • 11Tapo
    not tested

Wifi Router Range

  • 1EUFY U5i (bundle with extra 6500mAh quick-release rechargeable battery pack)
    225 ft

    the best of all cameras with a stated figure

  • 3AOSU
    220 ft2nd

    second best of all cameras with a stated figure (behind EUFY's 225 ft)

  • 2REOLINK
    not tested
  • 4ieGeek
    not tested
  • 5XTU
    not tested
  • 6Energizer
    not tested
  • 7Wyze
    not tested
  • 8Ring
    not tested
  • 9GridTera
    not tested
  • 10Blink
    not tested
  • 11Tapo
    not tested

How it was tested

  • daytime video quality, distance-marker readability, and field of view (40ft/25ft/10ft markers, license-plate readability, degrees of coverage)
  • doorbell chime alarm loudness (dB) at the highest volume setting
  • doorbell chime signal range through two walls (feet), tested for select brands (Tapo and Ring at 300 ft; Blink and EUFY could not be acquired with a chime in time to test)
  • night vision video quality, distance-marker readability, and motion-detection trigger distance
  • flashlight-blinding resistance (subjective rating)
  • overall nighttime video quality (subjective rating)
  • Wi-Fi router range (feet), tested for select brands (EUFY 225 ft, AOSU 220 ft)
  • mobile app features, usability, and subscription cost

If you're looking for a doorbell camera that excels at capturing distant subjects or objects, the ieGeek, XTU, Energizer, Real Link, and AOSU are the best at this task... For that reason, I really like the Real Link. If you're looking for a doorbell camera that isn't as good at distance, but much better up close, the Wise, Ring, and UFI do a great job of providing a head-to-toe view of the person at the front door. While all three cameras are good, I really like the UFI the best.

From the test video verdict.
Data notes and caveats

This video ends with a clean two-tier per-use-case verdict rather than one overall winner, so winner/runnerUp/budgetPick are left null per spec: a 'distance' tier (ieGeek, XTU, Energizer, Reolink, AOSU) with Reolink named the top pick despite weaker nighttime quality, and a 'close-up/head-to-toe' tier (Wyze, Ring, EUFY) with EUFY named the top pick and Wyze/Ring explicitly recommended as cheaper alternatives if EUFY exceeds budget. GridTera, Blink, and Tapo are not placed in either closing tier and are effectively the weakest overall performers. Five brand names are recurring auto-caption mangles resolved via the description: 'Grid Terra'/'Grera'/'Graraer'/'Grid Terror' resolves to GridTera, 'IE Geek'/'IEG'/'ID Geek'/'IE Gig' resolves to ieGeek, 'Wise' resolves to Wyze, 'Real Link'/'Riolink' resolves to REOLINK, and 'UFI'/'U5i' resolves to EUFY. Cross-checks in the video's own closing recap corroborate the extraction: exactly 4 cameras (ieGeek, XTU, Energizer, AOSU) can read the 40ft daytime marker as the narrator states, and exactly 4 cameras (Reolink, Wyze, Ring, EUFY) provide a head-to-toe view as the narrator states. Wyze's stated cloud-storage subscription price ($26/month) is a genuine outlier, 3 to 9 times pricier than every other brand's subscription figure in the same video ($3-$16/month range); kept as reported rather than corrected since nothing in the transcript contradicts it directly, but flagged given how far it sits from its neighbors.

More Gadgets & Tech