
Which Hammer Drills Brand Wins?
This head-to-head test of 6 hammer drills options has the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video. Shoppers cross-shopping rotary hammer, cordless hammer drill, harbor freight hammer drill and drill for brick land here for the head to head that settles it.
Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20
Price shown in test: 133
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The quick take
No single winner was declared in this test. Here is where the top-ranked pick landed, straight from the measured results.
Placed top three in 1 of 10 measurements.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.
Claimed specs
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20
brushless motor, peak torque 1,200 in-lb claimed, 0-550 RPM first gear / 0-2,000 RPM second gear claimed, 32,000 impacts per minute claimed, 5-year warranty, made in Vietnam, electronic clutch (motor comes to a full stop when the clutch activates, unlike the mechanical-clutch drills in this video), tool only (no battery/charger included at this price), tested with a 5Ah battery
- 2Makita XPH07Z
brushless motor, 1,090 in-lb max torque claimed, 0-550 RPM first gear / 0-2,100 RPM second gear claimed, 3-year warranty, made in China, mechanical clutch, tool only, tested with a 5Ah battery, has a battery level indicator on both the drill and the battery
- 3DeWalt DCD999B
'guaranteed tough' marketing tagline, 3-speed transmission (0-450 first / 0-1,300 second / 0-2,000 third RPM claimed), no maximum torque figure listed anywhere on the DeWalt packaging (unlike every other brand in this video), 3-year warranty, made in China, electronic clutch, tool only, tested with a 5Ah battery, has 3 selectable light intensity levels
- 4Ryobi One+ HP
brushless motor, 750 in-lb torque claimed (narrator notes Ryobi also sells a cheaper tool-only version rated for only 600 in-lb, and specifically chose to test the 750 in-lb kit instead), 3-year warranty, made in China, mechanical clutch (motor continues to spin when the clutch activates, unlike Milwaukee/DeWalt), includes a carrying case, claimed 30-minute charger, comes with a 4Ah battery, has a magnet on the front of the drill
- 5HART
drills concrete, brick, and masonry in hammer mode, heavy-duty metal chuck for increased durability, 3-year warranty, hammer made in Vietnam (driving bit, battery, and charger made in China), 0-375 RPM first gear / 0-1,600 RPM second gear claimed, brushed motor, 1.5Ah battery, 2A charger, no battery life indicator on the drill or battery
- 6Cacoop2-year
warranty, 0-400 RPM first gear / 0-1,400 RPM second gear claimed, max torque claimed as 40 Newton-meters (354 in-lb), battery and charger made in China, drill made in China, 2Ah battery, has a battery life indicator ('not bad for a budget tool'), comes with 6 spade bits, a carrying case, drill bits, and drivers, and offers no-clutch / clutch / hammer-drill mode options
Weight and length
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-203 lb
3 oz (1,447 g); 7 in long, the shortest/most compact of all 6 drills
- 2Makita XPH07Z3 lb
14.2 oz (1,765 g), the heaviest of all 6 drills; 8 in long
- 3DeWalt DCD999B3 lb2nd
9.3 oz (1,624 g), second heaviest of the 6 drills; 8.5 in long
- 4Ryobi One+ HP3 lb
2.1 oz (1,422 g), within 2 oz of HART and Milwaukee; 8 in long
- 5HART3 lb
1.6 oz (1,406 g), within 2 oz of Ryobi and Milwaukee; 8 and 7/8 in long
- 6Cacoop2 lb
12.9 oz (1,274 g / 44.9 oz), confirmed later as the lightest of all 6 drills; 8.5 in long
Noise
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-2083 dB
no-load, the loudest no-load reading of all 6 drills; 77 dB with the electronic clutch engaged
- 2Makita XPH07Z78 dB
no-load, tied quietest with DeWalt; 84 dB with the clutch engaged
- 3DeWalt DCD999B78 dB
no-load, tied quietest with Makita; 75 dB with the electronic clutch engaged, the quietest clutch noise of all 6 drills
- 4Ryobi One+ HP81 dB2nd
no-load, tied with HART; 101 dB with the clutch engaged, the second loudest clutch noise of the 6 drills
- 5HART81 dB
no-load, tied with Ryobi; 102 dB with the clutch engaged, described as 'loud as a chainsaw', the loudest clutch noise of all 6 drills
- 6Cacoop79 dB
no-load; 98 dB with the clutch engaged
No-load RPM (claimed vs measured)
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20515 RPM
in first gear (vs 550 claimed), 1,798 RPM in second gear (vs 2,000 claimed)
- 2Makita XPH07Z550 RPM
in first gear (matched its rating exactly), 2,154 RPM in second gear (beat its 2,100 rating); the highest measured RPM of all 6 drills in both gears
- 3DeWalt DCD999B450 RPM
in first gear (matched its rating), 1,330 RPM in second gear (slightly beat its 1,300 rating), 1,996 RPM in third gear (very close to its 2,000 rating)
- 4Ryobi One+ HP412 RPM
in first gear (vs 410 claimed), 1,769 RPM in second gear (vs 1,800 claimed)
- 5HART372 RPM
in first gear (close to its 375 rating), 1,570 RPM in second gear (a little short of its 1,600 rating)
- 6Cacoop400 RPM
in first gear (matched its rating exactly), 1,527 RPM in second gear (beat its 1,400 rating)
Clutch torque range
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20122 in-lb
at the lowest (level 1) setting, up to 173 in-lb at the highest (level 14) setting; narrator notes this is 'definitely not a tool for delicate work' since, unlike the mechanical-clutch drills, it cannot disengage near 0 in-lb
- 2Makita XPH07Z0 in-lb
at the lowest (level 1) setting, up to 107 in-lb at the highest (level 21) setting
- 3DeWalt DCD999B50 in-lb
at the lowest (level 1) setting, up to 327 in-lb at the highest (level 11) setting, a notably wide/high ceiling compared to the mechanical-clutch drills
- 4Ryobi One+ HP0 in-lb
at the lowest setting, up to 89 in-lb at the highest (level 24) setting
- 5HART0 in-lb
at the lowest setting, up to 44 in-lb at the highest (level 24) setting
- 6Cacoop0 in-lb
at the lowest setting, up to 52 in-lb at the highest (level 21) setting
Hammer drill concrete test (3/4in x 12in bit, 50 lb added weight)
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20
finished the full 12 in bit in 1 minute 53 seconds without slowing down, one of only 3 brands (with Makita and DeWalt) to finish the bit
- 2Makita XPH07Z
the fastest of all 6 drills, finishing the full bit in 1 minute 22 seconds (nearly 30 seconds faster than Milwaukee), but the battery overheated at the end of the test and required about 20 minutes to cool down
- 3DeWalt DCD999B
finished the full 12 in bit in 1 minute 43 seconds, 10 seconds faster than Milwaukee and 21 seconds slower than Makita, with no overheating issue
- 4Ryobi One+ HP
described as pretty fast but ran out of steam at 1 minute 33 seconds, reaching about 9.5 in into the concrete, the same depth as HART but reached about a minute faster
- 5HART
described as doing well for a budget tool, gave up at 2 minutes 6 seconds having reached about 9.5 in into the concrete, did not finish the full 12 in bit
- 6Cacoop
held in there for about 2.5 minutes before giving up, reaching about 7.75 in into the concrete, the shortest distance of all 6 drills
Max torque, 1/2in x 10in lag bolt, first gear
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20563 in-lb
the highest of all 6 drills
- 2Makita XPH07Z431 in-lb
third highest of the 6 drills
- 3DeWalt DCD999B508 in-lb
second highest of the 6 drills, behind only Milwaukee
- 4Ryobi One+ HP260 in-lb
fourth highest of the 6 drills
- 5HART209 in-lb
fifth of the 6 drills
- 6Cacoop125 in-lb
the lowest of all 6 drills
Runtime test (second gear, until battery depleted)
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-205Ah2nd
battery lasted just short of 64 minutes, second best of all 6 drills
- 2Makita XPH07Z5Ah
battery lasted 60 minutes 40 seconds, the shortest runtime of the three 5Ah-battery drills tested (Makita, Milwaukee, DeWalt)
- 3DeWalt DCD999B5Ah
battery ran for 70 minutes, the best runtime of all 6 drills
- 4Ryobi One+ HP4Ah3rd
battery lasted 49 minutes 40 seconds, third best runtime of the 6 drills
- 5HART1.5Ah
battery was the first of all 6 drills to run out, at just short of 22 minutes
- 6Cacoop2Ah
battery lasted about 44.5 minutes
All measurements (10 more)+
Low-speed control (minimum RPM)
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-2028 RPM
- 2Makita XPH07Z26 RPM
about the same as Milwaukee
- 3DeWalt DCD999B24 RPM
the best (lowest) of all 6 drills
- 5HART36 RPM
described as even better low RPM control than Cacoop
- 6Cacoop54 RPM
the highest (least precise) low-speed figure of the 6 drills
- 4Ryobi One+ HPnot tested
Max torque, 1/2in x 8in lag bolt, second gear
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20185 in-lb
the highest of all 6 drills
- 2Makita XPH07Z143 in-lb
second highest of the 6 drills
- 4Ryobi One+ HP107 in-lb
fourth highest of the 6 drills
- 5HART78 in-lb
fifth of the 6 drills
- 6Cacoop62 in-lb
the lowest of all 6 drills
- 3DeWalt DCD999Bnot tested
Endurance test (spinning a stalled engine requiring 63 in-lb, second gear)
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20
easily spun the engine for the full 2.5 minutes in second gear (a socket adapter came loose mid-test and was retightened before continuing); one of only 2 drills (with DeWalt) with enough power to complete this test in second gear
- 2Makita XPH07Z
had plenty of power and performed well for nearly a minute before the drill shut off due to the battery overheating, failing to complete the full 2-minute test
- 3DeWalt DCD999B
completed the full 2 minutes in second gear without the tool or battery overheating, described as doing 'a terrific job'; one of only 2 drills (with Milwaukee) to complete this test in second gear, and the only one of the two without any mid-test equipment issue
- 4Ryobi One+ HPnot tested
- 5HARTnot tested
- 6Cacoopnot tested
Charge time (fully drained 5Ah battery)
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-2046.5 minutes
the fastest of all 6 drills
- 2Makita XPH07Z108.5 minutes
by far the slowest of all 6 drills, more than twice Milwaukee's charge time
- 3DeWalt DCD999B76 minutes3rd
third slowest of the 6 drills
- 4Ryobi One+ HPnot tested
- 5HARTnot tested
- 6Cacoopnot tested
Endurance test (spinning a stalled engine requiring 63 in-lb)
- 4Ryobi One+ HP
did not have enough power to spin the engine in second gear, but lasted the full 2 minutes in first gear
- 5HART
did not have nearly enough power for second gear, but survived the full 2-minute test in first gear, losing a lot of speed near the end
- 6Cacoop
did not have enough power for second gear, survived the full 2-minute test in first gear but lost a lot of speed near the end
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20not tested
- 2Makita XPH07Znot tested
- 3DeWalt DCD999Bnot tested
Max torque, 1/2in x 8in lag bolt
- 3DeWalt DCD999B
tested twice due to its 3-speed transmission: 175 in-lb in second gear and 136 in-lb in third gear; the video's final leaderboard for this test uses the third-gear figure (136 in-lb) for DeWalt when ranking it against the other brands, an apparent test-design choice flagged here rather than silently reconciled
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20not tested
- 2Makita XPH07Znot tested
- 4Ryobi One+ HPnot tested
- 5HARTnot tested
- 6Cacoopnot tested
Low-speed control
- 4Ryobi One+ HP
no specific minimum RPM number was given by the narrator for this brand; described only qualitatively as offering 'very good low RPM control just like the Milwaukee, DeWalt, and the Makita'
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20not tested
- 2Makita XPH07Znot tested
- 3DeWalt DCD999Bnot tested
- 5HARTnot tested
- 6Cacoopnot tested
Charge time (fully drained 4Ah battery)
- 4Ryobi One+ HP77.5 minutes
despite the product's own claim of a 30-minute charger, a discrepancy kept verbatim and flagged rather than resolved
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20not tested
- 2Makita XPH07Znot tested
- 3DeWalt DCD999Bnot tested
- 5HARTnot tested
- 6Cacoopnot tested
Charge time (fully drained 1.5Ah battery)
- 5HART52.5 minutes2nd
second fastest of the 6 drills
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20not tested
- 2Makita XPH07Znot tested
- 3DeWalt DCD999Bnot tested
- 4Ryobi One+ HPnot tested
- 6Cacoopnot tested
Charge time (fully drained 2Ah battery)
- 6Cacoop72 minutes
- 1Milwaukee FUEL 2804-20not tested
- 2Makita XPH07Znot tested
- 3DeWalt DCD999Bnot tested
- 4Ryobi One+ HPnot tested
- 5HARTnot tested
How it was tested
- weight and length comparison
- LED work light brightness comparison
- no-load noise level in decibels, with and without the clutch engaged
- no-load RPM measurement in first and (where applicable) second/third gear, compared against each brand's claimed rating
- low-speed / low-RPM control precision
- clutch torque range, from lowest to highest clutch setting, measured with an inline torque adapter
- hammer drill concrete-drilling test using a 3/4 in x 12 in bit with a 50 lb weight added to the drill, drilling into concrete cured for 3 months
- maximum torque driving a 1/2 in x 10 in lag bolt in first gear
- maximum torque driving a 1/2 in x 8 in lag bolt in second (and for DeWalt, also third) gear
- endurance test spinning a stalled engine requiring 63 in-lb of torque, attempted in second gear then first gear
- battery runtime test in second gear until each battery was fully depleted
- charge time for each fully drained battery
“So, which drill is the best? I think that really depends on what you're looking for. The Milwaukee is definitely the most compact as well as powerful. However, the electronic clutch is definitely not going to be the best option if you're dealing with delicate fasteners. On the other hand, the Makita does have the right clutch for delicate fasteners and also offers a higher RPM range. The DeWalt seems to be a third-place finish.”


