
Which Jack Stands (6 Ton Rated Pairs) Brand Wins?
This head-to-head test of 11 jack stands (6 ton rated pairs) options has the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.
Some figures on this page were transcribed from the test video and have not been independently re-verified. Treat the numbers as a close guide and watch the full video for the exact readings.
TCE
Price shown in test: $46
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.
Made in
- 1TCE
China
- 2Arcan
China
- 3Big Red
China
- 4Larin
China
- 5Daytona
China
- 6Sunex
China
- 7Husky
China
- 8Esco
China (implied; not explicitly restated but consistent with all other brands except Hein Werner and US Jack)
- 9ZSP
China
- 10Hein Werner
USA
- 11US Jack
USA
Weight
- 1TCE
transcript reads '14.77%'; almost certainly 14.77 lb with the unit garbled to a percent sign, kept literal and flagged
- 2Arcan15.52 lb
- 3Big Red15.11 lb
- 4Larin12.95 lb
the lightest of the brands tested up to that point in the video
- 5Daytona
transcript reads '15.82% 7 lb'; almost certainly a garbled 15.82 lb (heaviest of the brands stated up to that point), kept literal and flagged
- 6Sunex
transcript reads '15.53% behind the tce'; the weight figure (approximately 15.53 lb) is followed by a garbled, seemingly unrelated fragment ('behind the tce') that does not parse as a coherent sentence; kept literal and flagged as unresolvable caption corruption
- 7Husky
transcript reads '15.4.1 lbs' (a double decimal point, a clear caption-split-decimal artifact); almost certainly 15.41 lb, kept literal and flagged
- 8Esco11.51 lb
the lightest yet at that point in the video
- 9ZSP
extremely light at only 4.35 lb
- 10Hein Werner
transcript reads '2.42m it', an unresolvable caption corruption; described as by far the heaviest jack stand of the video, but no usable numeric value could be recovered
- 11US Jack14.52 lb
Claims
- 2Arcan
base pads prevent the jack from sinking into asphalt; counterweighted pawl locks in place; 10.5 by 11.5in base for superior stability
- 3Big Red
large saddle surface area for better load contact
- 4Larin
heavy-duty steel body and collar; locking-pin style (not a ratchet bar) for added safety; full welds for added strength
- 5Daytona
heavy duty reinforced steel base; double locking mobility pin for extra safety; welded foot pads to disperse the load
- 6Sunex
large saddles with locating lugs for support; self-lock ratchet stud that prevents the stand from lowering under load
- 7Husky
heavy-duty steel base with anti-sink feet for added durability and safety
- 8Esco
circular base pads for maximum stability and safety; rated 3 tons per stand or 6 tons for the pair per the owner's manual
- 9ZSP6
ton adjustable performance car and truck jack stand (3 ton per stand); built with high quality cast ductile iron; very compact; manufacturer claims it is 'as steady as a rock'
- 10Hein Werner
dual-purpose handle serves as both a carry handle and a saddle-column release; multi-purpose ratchet bar for strength and durability
- 11US Jack
double lock security system using two pawls to engage two teeth on the load bar
- 1TCEnot tested
Test 2 - rubber mat/soft asphalt simulation
- 1TCE154.32 lb
test was stopped early (before full failure) to preserve the stand for further testing
- 2Arcan
transcript reads '1549 lb'; almost certainly garbled, since the narrator explicitly says this result is 'almost the same as the TCE' (154.32 lb), implying the true value is about 154.9 lb, not 1549; kept literal with this cross-reference flagged
- 3Big Red
transcript reads '148.9mm'; the 'mm' unit is clearly a caption artifact (should be lb, not millimeters); the vehicle fell off one of the jack stands at this point, and the feet were described as digging badly into the rubber mat
- 4Larin151 lb
described as still a pretty good performance; this brand's feet lack rubber pads, which held it back somewhat and caused sinking into the mat
- 5Daytonaalmost154 lb
described as performing well; foot pads helped prevent sinking into the mat
- 6Sunex169.99 lb
pads on the feet helped it stay stable on all four legs
- 8Esco147.5 lb
the three-leg design held it back a little, though the foot pads did a pretty good job
- 10Hein Werner
transcript reads '159.jpg' (an unmistakable caption/OCR corruption where a number appears to have been replaced by an image filename-like string); described as offering the second highest ground clearance of all brands but lacking foot pads; the narrator separately states this brand 'moves into second place' and 'performed very well' at this same garbled '159.jpg' figure, followed immediately by an oddly-placed '3351 lbs' fragment that does not fit this test's expected range and may actually belong to the later two-leg forward tip test (where Husky, Hein Werner, and Larin are said to finish within a pound of each other around 372 lb); none of this could be confidently resolved to real numbers and is flagged rather than guessed
- 7Huskynot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Test 3 - two-leg forward tip test
- 1TCE
no distinct number stated directly for the TCE in this test; only inferable from the Arcan's own result being described as '15 lb more than the TCE' at 350 lb, implying an inferred TCE value of about 335 lb; this is a derived/inferred figure, not a directly quoted one
- 2Arcan350 lb
described as 15 lb more than the TCE's inferred value; has a longer base than the TCE, which helped
- 3Big Red362 lb
described as good enough to move into the lead over the Arcan; has a lower maximum height than the Arcan, which helped, despite a shorter base
- 4Larin371.5 lb
described as moving into the lead over the Big Red; uses a locking pin design rather than a ratchet bar, which the narrator credits for the strong result
- 5Daytona334.3 lb
ratchet bar leaned toward the front of the vehicle a little during the test with the locking pins in place
- 6Sunex345.8 lb
the ratchet bar began to lift and lean forward, shifting the center of gravity
- 7Husky372 lb
moving into the lead; benefits from a longer base; transcript describes this as 'less than a pound less than the Larin' even though 372 is numerically greater than Larin's 371.5, an apparent internal logic inconsistency kept as stated rather than corrected
- 11US Jack
transcript reads '2978 lb'; following the same apparent extra-digit garble pattern as other brands in these tests, almost certainly about 297.8 lb; described as hurt by not having as long a base as some other brands despite offering the highest lift
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
Handle test, roll pin in place (~1,400 lb load)
- 1TCE
roll pin sheared at just over 200 lb; passed
- 2Arcan
roll pin did not shear until about 268 lb; passed
- 3Big Red
roll pin held to almost 300 lb, described as 100 lb more than the TCE, before finally giving out with 'a big bang' (bent ratchet bar and four bent legs)
- 5Daytona
roll pin did not break until over 360 lb, the best yet at that point in testing
- 6Sunex
roll pin held on for a long time before finally letting go at 340 lb
- 7Husky
roll pin broke at 242 lb, about 100 lb less than the Sunex
- 10Hein Werner
roll pin held in for quite a long time before finally breaking at just over 300 lb
- 11US Jack
did not collapse despite quite a bit of upward force applied; uses a different (non-roll-pin) locking mechanism so no comparable numeric force is given
- 4Larinnot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
Test 1 - lateral tip force
- 2Arcan169 lb
stated as 18 lb less than the TCE
- 3Big Red189.5 lb
the best yet at that point in testing
- 4Larinjust over172 lb
before losing balance
- 5Daytona
no clear individual number given in the transcript for this brand in this specific test; the surrounding sentence only confirms 'the Big Red holds onto the lead' (implying Daytona scored lower than Big Red's 189.5 lb), but no distinct Daytona figure is stated; flagged as a data gap rather than invented
- 7Husky
transcript reads '1995.5 lb'; following the same apparent garble pattern seen with the TCE and other brands in this test (an extra/misplaced digit inflating a ~150-200 lb range result), the true value is likely around 199.5 lb; kept literal and flagged, described as moving into the lead when it finally reached the tipping point
- 9ZSP
both jack stands broke (not merely tipped) at only 95 lb of lateral force; explicitly called out by the narrator as 'definitely the most dangerous jack stands I've ever seen'
- 10Hein Werner187.5 lb
before 'dancing around' on the way down, nearly knocking over the camera (camera survived undamaged); this figure is numerically identical to the Esco's stated Test 1 result of 187.5 lb, which may be coincidental or may reflect a transcript duplication; flagged rather than assumed
- 11US Jack186.653 lb
(transcript caption split the decimal across a line break: "186.65" then "3 lb"; joined as one continuous reading); toppled over at this point, described as finishing behind the Big Red (189.5 lb), with 'several other brands were all within a pound of each other'
- 1TCEnot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 8Esconot tested
Test 4 - maximum vertical load to failure
- 2Arcanclose to33,000 lb
handle twisted and the locking mechanism was crushed under load; same type of ratchet-bar failure later seen on the Sunex
- 3Big Redjust over36,000 lb
one leg began to buckle before the final failure with a bent ratchet bar and four bent legs
- 5Daytonajust over33,000 lb
ratchet bar assembly began to stretch
- 6Sunexjust over33,000 lb
ratchet bar and assembly bent and broke, described as the same type of failure seen on the Arcan
- 7Husky
described as reaching almost 36,000 lb with a bad popping sound, then continuing ('jumped right back into the fight') to a further failure noted at 32,000 lb when the ratchet bar and assembly began bending and breaking; the two-stage description is kept as stated even though the second figure is lower than the first, rather than assumed to be a single result
- 8Escoalmost30,000 lb
- 10Hein Wernerjust over31,000 lb
ratchet bar assembly broke near the weld
- 11US Jack
feet began to buckle at almost 37,000 lb, but the ratchet bar itself did not give up; legs finally buckled at over 47,500 lb, the highest failure load of any brand in the video
- 1TCEnot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
All measurements (14 more)+
Height range
- 1TCEapproximately15in
to just about 24in
- 2Arcan15
5/8 in to 24 5/8 in (11in of total range)
- 3Big Red15
3/8 in on the lowest setting to 23 7/8 in on the highest
- 4Larin14.5 in
to 24 1/4 in (11.75in total range, the most of any brand)
- 8Escojust under13in
without the rubber pad, just under 21in with it
- 9ZSPabout10.5in
to around 16.25in on the highest setting, offering notably less ground clearance than other brands
- 11US Jack
most clearance of any brand, just over 25.5in
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
Side-to-side movement
- 2Arcanalmost7/10
of an inch
- 3Big Redjust over1/3
of an inch, the best (least movement) of the brands tested up to that point in the video
- 4Larin
less than 1/2 inch, described as pretty good
- 7Huskyjust over1/2 inch
anti-sink feet add a lot of stability
- 8Escoalmost1/2 inch
- 9ZSPalmost3/4
of an inch, the most slop of any brand tested
- 11US Jack
less than 1/10 of an inch, the least slop of any brand tested, though the narrator notes its greater height puts it at a disadvantage in the tipping tests
- 1TCEnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
Welds
- 1TCE
described as pretty decent
- 2Arcan
look better than the TCE's welds, but has a lot of slop in the ratchet bar
- 3Big Red
quality looks about the same as the TCE
- 7Husky
quality seems acceptable but not as good as some other brands
- 8Esco
look good enough but not as good as some other brands
- 11US Jack
look very good
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
Handle test, lock removed (~800 lb load)
- 1TCE
collapsed with only around 180 lb of upward force on the handle
- 2Arcan
does not have a locking pin to prevent collapse if the handle is contacted; dropped the load with only 27 lb of upward force, much weaker than the TCE
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Side-to-side movement (highest setting)
- 1TCEjust over1/2 inch
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Test 1 - lateral tip force (Ford Ranger, dry pavement)
- 1TCE
transcript reads '1866 lb'; almost certainly garbled (an inserted or misplaced digit), since every other brand in this same test scored in the 150-200 lb range and the Arcan result is explicitly stated as '18 lb less than the TCE' at 169 lb, which would put the TCE's true value at about 187 lb, not 1866; kept literal with this cross-reference flagged rather than silently corrected
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Test 4 - maximum vertical load to failure (100 ton press, flat surface)
- 1TCEalmost39,000 lb
when all four feet buckled/crushed
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Quality control note
- 3Big Red
one ratchet bar was extremely stiff and would not settle into the locked position without help; the other stand's ratchet started stiff and loosened up quickly; the chain holding the locking pin arrived already broken
- 1TCEnot tested
- 2Arcannot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Quality note
- 4Larin
narrator jokes this stand 'looks like it was built on a Friday just before punching the time clock'
- 1TCEnot tested
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Asymmetry note
- 7Husky
one of the pair's stands is about 5/16 in taller than the other; lowest position just over 15.2in, highest just over 24.5in
- 1TCEnot tested
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Design
- 8Esco
the only three-legged jack stand design in the video
- 1TCEnot tested
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Note
- 8Esco
does not offer enough lifting height to keep the rear wheels of the test Ford Ranger off the ground; the narrator gently lowered the truck and chained the rear axle to the frame for the remaining tests as a result
- 1TCEnot tested
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Test 1 - lateral tip force (three-legged stability check)
- 8Esco187.5 lb
large foot pads and lower clearance both helped a three-legged design in this test
- 1TCEnot tested
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 9ZSPnot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
Test 4 - maximum vertical load to failure (repaired with a bolt after Test 1 breakage)
- 9ZSP
with the center bar carrying the load (legs not load-bearing in this configuration), reached almost 15,000 lb, about half the load of the other brands, before failing; a second ZSP stand tested with the legs carrying the load instead had one leg completely break off at around 5,000 lb
- 1TCEnot tested
- 2Arcannot tested
- 3Big Rednot tested
- 4Larinnot tested
- 5Daytonanot tested
- 6Sunexnot tested
- 7Huskynot tested
- 8Esconot tested
- 10Hein Wernernot tested
- 11US Jacknot tested
How it was tested
- lateral tip force test (Ford Ranger loaded onto jack stands on dry pavement, force to reach tipping point)
- soft asphalt simulation (rubber mat under the loaded truck to see how much force causes sinking/tipping)
- two-leg forward tip test (truck rocked forward onto two legs, progressive load to tipping point)
- handle/roll-pin safety test, phase one (lock removed, approximately 800 lb load, upward force applied to the handle to see if the stand collapses)
- handle/roll-pin safety test, phase two (lock/roll pin in place, approximately 1,400 lb load, force required to shear the roll pin)
- maximum vertical load to failure (100 ton hydraulic press pressing straight down on a flat surface)
- side-to-side (wobble) movement measurement
- weight, height range, and base dimension measurements
Data notes and caveats
This transcript has unusually heavy numeric caption corruption throughout, well beyond typical brand-name mangling: several Test 1 (lateral tip) and Test 3 (two-leg forward tip) results for TCE, Husky, and US Jack appear to have an extra or misplaced digit inflating an expected ~150-370 lb range result into a 4-digit number (for example '1866 lb' for the TCE, cross-referenced against the Arcan's stated 18 lb differential to imply a true value around 187 lb; '1995.5 lb' for the Husky; '2978 lb' for the US Jack's Test 3 result, likely 297.8 lb). Hein Werner's Test 2/3 results suffered the worst corruption, rendering as the literal non-numeric string '159.jpg' followed by an unrelated '3351 lbs' fragment; neither could be resolved to real figures. The closing average-finish ranking is internally inconsistent: the US Jack is described as finishing 'just over third place' while the Husky, with an explicit average finish of 3.3, is called 'a close second' - a lower average-finish number should represent a better placement under this channel's usual scoring convention, so these two statements point in opposite directions and could not be reconciled from the transcript alone. Because of this contradiction, no single winner is declared here (winner: null) despite the video appearing to build toward one. Additional safety-relevant findings: ZSP ($178) broke outright at only 95 lb of lateral force in Test 1 (versus other brands merely tipping in the 150-200 lb range) and is called out explicitly by the narrator as the most dangerous jack stand he has ever tested, prompting a direct on-camera warning against buying adjustable-leg jack stands of this style. In the handle safety test (lock removed, ~800 lb load), the narrator notes that, unlike a prior 3-ton jack stand video where most stands passed, none of the ratchet-bar-style stands in this video passed; Larin, Esco, and US Jack were excluded from this specific test because they use locking-pin or double-pawl designs rather than the traditional handle/ratchet bar. Esco's three-legged design meant it could not keep the test truck's rear wheels elevated at full height, so the truck was partially lowered and chained for the remaining tests; Esco was also excluded from the two-leg forward tip test, likely for the same structural reason, though this is not explained directly.


