Which Outdoor Solar Security Lights Brand Wins?

claims 1,200 lm, 302 LED lights, motion sensor range up to 49.2 ft, 180 degree induction angle, improved solar conversion rate, 1,800 mA hour battery, made in China

claims 1,200 lm, 6,000 mA hour battery, 270 degree wide coverage, 180 degree motion detection range, customizable motion duration of 20, 30, or 40 seconds, split design with a flexible 9.8 ft cable, made in China

claims a 270 degree wide angle, 120 LEDs, high efficiency solar panels, IP65 waterproof, made in China

claims waterproof construction, three lighting modes, motion detection, reliable service in harsh weather

claims three lighting modes, IP65 waterproof, up to 30 percent solar conversion efficiency, absorbs light for 8 hours during the day, made in China

by far the heaviest light at that point in the video; claims IP65 waterproof, heat resistant, frost resistant, 1,200 mA hour battery, 6 to 8 hour charging time, 8 to 10 hour working time, made in China

claims extremely bright at 3,000 lm, a 1.8 W / 5.5 V solar panel, 2,200 mA hour battery, motion sensor detection range of 26 to 32 ft, made in China

claims 2,500 lm, a three-head light with a total of 156 LEDs, sensing distance up to 40 ft, 5.5 V / 8 W solar panel, made in China

the heaviest light at that point in the video; claims 2,500 lm, sensing distance up to 30 ft, 158 LEDs, 180 degree sensor detection angle, 1.2 W solar panel, made in China

by far the heaviest light at that point in the video; claims 3,500 lm, 360 degree illumination, 15 hours of run time after just 3 hours of sun exposure, a 50 percent solar conversion rate, a 2,500 mA hour battery, motion detection up to 60 ft, made in China

claims a 27 percent solar conversion rate, 10 to 12 hours of illumination after a full day of charging, 416 LED lights, motion detection from 13 to 20 ft at a 120 degree angle, made in China

claims 2,500 lm, 210 LED lights, IP65 waterproof, a 270 degree wide angle floodlight, motion sensing from 26 ft away, a 2,000 mA hour rechargeable battery, made in China

claims 202 LEDs, a solar panel with a 16.4 ft cable and remote control mounting option, 2,800 lm of brightness, a 4 hour charge time in direct sunlight, and only a 20 percent solar conversion rate

claims 113 bright LEDs, a 16 ft cable for remote solar panel placement, lighting coverage up to 676 sq ft, a 4 hour charge time for 12 hours of lighting, a polycrystalline solar panel with an 18.5 percent conversion rate, made in China

claims 299 LED lights, a 16.4 ft extension cord, a monocrystalline panel with a 21 percent energy conversion rate, a 4,000 mA hour battery, output equivalent to a 100 W incandescent bulb, up to 15 hours of light production, made in China

at the test port at 30 seconds, extrapolated total 1,301 lm, first place, by far the brightest light in the lineup

at the test port, extrapolated total 756 lm, described as performing well

dropping to 60 lm at 30 seconds, extrapolated total approximately 227 lm (light panel measured as 3.78 times larger than the test port)

dropping to 52 lm at 30 seconds, extrapolated total approximately 141 lm

at the test port, described as by far the brightest so far at that point in the video, extrapolated total 386 lm

described as definitely not the brightest, extrapolated total 162 lm

dropping to 115 lm at 30 seconds, described as the best yet at that point in the video, extrapolated total 860 lm

dropping to around 157 lm at 30 seconds, described as the best yet at that point in the video, extrapolated total 993 lm, second place overall behind the Philips

at 30 seconds, extrapolated total 420 lm

only 24 lm despite being a large and heavy light, extrapolated total 286 lm

at around 30 seconds, extrapolated total 492 lm

described as losing quite a bit of brightness as it heated up, extrapolated total 721 lm

at around 30 seconds, extrapolated total 555 lm

described as isn't so super, extrapolated total 332 lm

extrapolated total 422 lm

described as very impressive; the best motion detector in the lineup

described as a little bit better than average

performed the same as the Aootek

described as really struggling in this test

described as not very bright but moving into the lead for motion range at that point in the video

despite being one of the brightest lights in the lineup

described as even brighter than the INCX with a better motion detector

described as not quite as good as the Daphino

described as not as good as the Daphino or MIHANI

described as performing better than average, tied with the Brightever and Daphino

described as even better than the TEKNET

described as almost as good as the Tuffenough

described as not quite as super as some of the other lights

no motion detector, skipped from this test

more intense than Daphino

moved into the lead at that point in the video

about the same as the Peasur

described as the most intense light yet at that point in the video

described as by far the most intense light yet at that point in the video, second place overall behind the Philips

second place behind the Daphino at that point in the video

described as trailing most of the competition

described as also intense enough

described as performing a little bit better than average; no always-on setting, consistent with the later dusk-to-dawn contradiction noted above

at the test area, extrapolated total 131 lm; described as the brightest light in the lineup and performing well in this test

at the test area, extrapolated total 227 lm, second place behind the APILAB

at the test area, extrapolated total 23 lm

at the test area, extrapolated total 14 lm

at the test area, extrapolated total 36 lm, described as once again brighter than the Aootek and Peasur

at the test area, extrapolated total 11 lm, described as still not the brightest

at the test area, extrapolated total 120 lm, described as continuing to outperform most of the competition

at the test area, extrapolated total 48 lm, described as continuing to trail the Daphino

at the test area, extrapolated total 84 lm, second place behind the Daphino

at the test area, extrapolated total 30 lm, described as really struggling in this test

at the test area, extrapolated total 105 lm, described as performing well

at the test area, extrapolated total 32 lm, described as continuing to trail the Tuffenough

at the test area, extrapolated total 28 lm, described as not so super on dusk-to-dawn mode

the transcript contains a direct contradiction here: it first states 'The Jackie LED does not have a dusk to dawn mode,' then in the very next sentence gives a dusk-to-dawn reading of 30 lm at the test area for an extrapolated total of 372 lm, second place behind the APILAB. Both the 372 lm figure and the second-place finish are reconfirmed in the closing ranking recap, so the numeric data appears real despite the contradictory 'does not have' statement; both are recorded here and the contradiction is flagged rather than silently resolved

held steady at 11 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 131 lm

dropped from 40 to 24 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 136 lm, third place

unchanged at 6 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 23 lm

dropped from 5 to 3 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 8 lm

dropped from 10 to 9 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 33 lm

dropped from 2 to 1 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 6 lm

dropped from 19 to 16 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 101 lm

dropped from 11 to 9 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 39 lm

dropped from 7 to 4 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 48 lm

dropped from 3 to 2 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 20 lm

dropped from 15 to 14 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 98 lm

dropped from 4 to 3 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 24 lm

dropped from 3 to 1 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 9 lm

now at 14 lm at the test area, extrapolated total 174 lm, second place behind the APILAB

powered down at the same time as the Aootek and HMCITY

lasting a few minutes longer than the Philips, Aootek, and HMCITY group

powered down at the same time as the Philips and HMCITY

very close to 23 hours, second longest of all lights tested

powered down at the same time as the Philips and Aootek

out of battery at close to 8 hours, tied with MIHANI for shortest run time of the lights tested

out of battery at close to 8 hours, tied with Daphino for shortest run time of the lights tested

the longest run time of all lights tested

out of battery at 11.5 hours

described by the host as pretty good despite not being the brightest

second place behind the APILAB

third place in the always-on candela ranking