CategoriesBrand vs BrandProject FarmGuidesThe LosersAbout
Which USB-C Charger Brand Wins?
2025 test17 productsGadgets & Tech

Which USB-C Charger Brand Wins?

This head-to-head test of 17 usb-c charger options has the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.

The verdict
Ranked first

Anker 20W two-port

Price shown in test: $14

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The quick take

No single winner was declared in this test. Here is where the top-ranked pick landed, straight from the measured results.

Ranked firstAnker 20W two-port$14

Best in 2 of 8 measurements, including Efficiency and Wall pullout force.

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.

Tier

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    under65W
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    under65W
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    under65W
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    under65W
  • 5Samsung 50W
    under65W
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    65

    to 99W

  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    65

    to 99W

  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    65

    to 99W

  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    65

    to 99W

  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    65

    to 99W

  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    65

    to 99W

  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    65

    to 99W

  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    100W

    and up

  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    100W

    and up

  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    100W

    and up

  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    100W

    and up

  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    100W

    and up

Weight

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    54 g
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    86 g

    heaviest of the under-65W tier at introduction

  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    56 g
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    38 g
  • 5Samsung 50W
    124 g

    heaviest of the under-65W tier

  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    162 g
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    144 g
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    140 g
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    110 g
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    118 g
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    118 g
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    162 g
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    388 g
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    280 g
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    270 g
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    662 g

    by far the heaviest of all 18 chargers

  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    308 g

Standby power

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    0 W
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    0 W
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    0 W
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    0 W
  • 5Samsung 50W
    about0.63 W
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    0 W
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    0.17 W
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    0.12 W
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    0 W
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    about0.2 W

    bouncing between 0.18 and 0.23 W

  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    about0.15 W
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    0.24 W
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    about0.4 W

    average, ranging 0.3 to 0.51 W

  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    0.7 W

    highest standby draw of all 18 chargers

  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    0.13 W
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    0.07 W2nd

    2nd best in the 100W+ tier behind Bovicas's 0 W

  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    0.11 W

Temperature after 30 min charging

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    just under122 F

    coolest of the under-65W tier

  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    around149 F
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    151 F
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    171 F
  • 5Samsung 50W
    close to150 F
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    144.1 F

    coolest in the 65-99W tier at that point

  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    close to140 F

    (also reported as 139.9 F elsewhere), coolest in the 65-99W tier for this test

  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    149.5 F
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    151 F
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    167.8 F

    hot

  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    174 F

    hottest in the 65-99W tier at that point

  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    167 F
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    157.8 F
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    175.3 F
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    149.8 F
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    108.5 F

    by far the coolest of all 18 chargers on this test

  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    over194 F

    hottest of all 18 chargers on this single-device test

Multi-device max output

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    10.56 W

    + 6.2 W = 16.82 W across 2 ports, peak temperature 158 F, no wattage drop

  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    18.5 W

    on one port and just over 32 W on the other, dropping about 4 W total once fully warmed, temperature around 189 F; a separate mention states close to 23 W per receptacle fully warmed up at around 170 F, which is not fully reconciled with the first figures and is preserved as a second reading rather than merged

  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    20.4 W

    + 7.2 W + 3.4 W = 31 W across 3 ports, dropping to 28.17 W once the charger became very hot at 219 F

  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    27.6 W

    + 19.3 W + 9.6 W = 56.5 W, temperature 156 F

  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    15.25 W

    + 43.12 W = 58.42 W across 2 ports, temperature around 141 F, coolest of the 65-99W tier under multi-device load

  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    68 W

    with one device, dropping to around 18 W with a second device, then 9.8 W and 4.1 W described as poor for a 65 W charger with additional devices; the transcript's exact device count/order at this point is ambiguous and preserved verbatim rather than reconciled; maximum single-device temperature reached 159 F

  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    38.7 W

    + 13 W + 5 W = 56.7 W across 3 ports, temperature around 195 F, only a very small wattage decrease

  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    44.4 W

    + 11.3 W + 5 W = 61 W, fully warmed up at 189 F

  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    19 W

    + 3 W + 16.7 W = 38.7 W with 3 ports, improving to around 64 W total with only 2 devices; became very hot at around 195 F

  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    47 W

    + 9.3 W + 5.7 W = 62 W across 3 ports, temperature 192 F, dropped only about half a watt total

  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    34.5 W

    + 61.1 W + 33 W = 128.7 W, temperature 138 F, no drop in performance

  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    129.2 W

    total, temperature 224 F, the hottest of all 18 chargers; only a small drop to 128.92 W under load

  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    38.6 W

    + 43 W + 46.9 W = 128.5 W, most balanced across ports of the 100W+ tier, peak temperature 190 F, no wattage drop

  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station

    peak production of 161.6 W across 4 devices, stayed relatively cool, no wattage drop

  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    50.4 W

    + 44.8 W + 28.36 W = 123.56 W, temperature 220 F, described as not as good as some other chargers in this category

  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested

Wall pullout force

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    36 oz

    best of the under-65W tier

  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN

    foldable blades facing down measured 13 (unit ambiguous in transcript, likely oz); reoriented the opposite direction it improved to 27 oz

  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port

    fixed blades, 31 oz

  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port

    non-folding blades, 28 oz

  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    32 oz

    best of the 65-99W tier

  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN

    folding blades facing up, gave up early at 19 oz

  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    20 oz

    a small amount better than Amlink

  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port

    really struggled at only 10 oz

  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port

    essentially fell out of the outlet, too little force to register on the meter, worst of the 65-99W tier

  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W

    fell out of the wall with the pull meter still reading zero, worst of the 100W+ tier

  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    36 oz

    tied for best of the 100W+ tier

  • 17UGREEN 160W total output

    very heavy, prone to falling out of the outlet, gauge still reading 0 oz, tied-worst of the 100W+ tier

  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested

Single-device charging ramp (outlet W / power bank W at start, 5 min, 30 min)

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    19 W

    / 16 W, then 19.6 W / 17 W, then 20.4 W / 17 W

  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    41.7 W

    / 37 W, then 43.55 W / 38 W, then 45.73 W / 40 W

  • 5Samsung 50W
    47.6 W

    / 41 W, then 49.6 W / 43 W, then 51.28 W / 45 W, the highest raw output of the under-65W tier

  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    60.4 W

    / 53 W, then 64.3 W / 57 W, then 66.3 W / 59 W

  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    just under62 W

    / 55 W, then 65 W / 58 W, then 68.5 W / 61 W

  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    61.45 W

    / 54 W, then 64.7 W / 56 W, then 67.3 W / 59 W, the best raw output in the 65-99W tier at that point in the video

  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    60.7 W

    / 54 W, then 63.9 W / 56 W, then 66.9 W / 59 W, described as about the same as Amlink

  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    almost63 W

    / 54 W, then 66 W / 57 W, then 67.61 W / 59 W, described as about the same as the Anker Nano 2

  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    just under65 W

    / 55 W, then 68 W / 59 W, then just over 71 W / 61 W, the highest raw output in the 65-99W tier at that point in the video

  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    57 W

    / 50 W, then just over 60 W / 52 W, then just over 62 W / 55 W, described as underperforming throughout

  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    101.38 W

    / 90 W, then 101.93 W / 90 W, then 102.38 W / 91 W, very stable across the test

  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

Efficiency (single-device test)

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    91.7%

    best of the under-65W tier

  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    90.7%

    2nd in the under-65W tier

  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    92%

    2nd in the 65-99W tier behind the Anker Prime

  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    92.6%

    best of the 65-99W tier

  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    93.1%

    2nd in the 100W+ tier behind the Minix

  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    93.3%

    best of the 100W+ tier

  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested
All measurements (8 more)+

Efficiency (multi-device test)

  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    96.3%

    best of the 65-99W tier on this specific measure, though it ran hot at 195 F during that test (a separate, hotter reading than the 174 F single-device ramp figure above)

  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    92%

    best of the 100W+ tier on this specific measure

  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    85.7%

    2nd in the 100W+ tier behind TOPADRE

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    not tested
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

Size

  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    3

    cubic inches, smallest of the lowest-power charger group

  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    7.8

    cubic inches, most compact of the 100W+ tier

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    not tested
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

Multi-device temperature ranking

  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    140.6 F

    best of the 65-99W tier in the multi-device max-output section (a distinct test from the 139.9 F single-device ramp temperature above)

  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    136 F

    best of the 100W+ tier in the multi-device max-output section (a distinct, hotter test from the 108.5 F single-device figure above)

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    not tested
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

Single-device charging ramp on the 100W-rated port (outlet W / power bank W at start, 5 min, 30 min)

  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    92.27 W

    / 82 W, then 98.8 W / 88 W, then 104.3 W / 93 W, the best raw output in the 100W+ tier at that point

  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    94.9 W

    / 83 W, then 102.44 W / 89 W, then 105.5 W / 92 W

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    not tested
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

Single-device charging ramp on the 140W-rated port (outlet W / power bank W at start, 5 min, 30 min)

  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    132 W

    / 121 W, then 143.3 W / 129 W, then 148.5 W / 133 W, the best raw output in the 100W+ tier

  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    134.27 W

    / 118 W, then 149.6 W / 132 W, then 151.6 W / 134 W, the highest raw single-port output of all 18 chargers

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    not tested
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested

Rated-capability achievement

  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN

    rated for 47 W, achieved 99.2% of rated capability in the multi-device efficiency comparison, best of the under-65W tier on this specific measure

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

Single-device charging ramp on a 20W port (outlet W / power bank W at start, 5 min, 30 min)

  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    19.7 W

    / 16 W, then just over 20 W / 17 W, then just over 21 W / 17 W; produced 8.91 Wh over the 30 minutes

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    not tested
  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

Single-device charging notes

  • 4FEEL2NICE 20W single-port

    could not get the charger to charge the test power bank at all; switched devices and measured just under 9 W on a different power bank, about 12.5 W on a cell phone, and a ramp on a jump starter of 12 W at start, 12.4 W / 10 W at 5 min, 12.4 W / 10 W at 30 min

  • 1Anker 20W two-port
    not tested
  • 2Anker 47W Nano, two-port foldable GAN
    not tested
  • 3Aioneus 40W four-port
    not tested
  • 5Samsung 50W
    not tested
  • 6UGREEN 65W four-port
    not tested
  • 7Anker Prime, 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 8Amlink 65W three-port GAN
    not tested
  • 9Anker Nano 2, 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 10TECKNET 65W three-port
    not tested
  • 11Belkin 67W three-port
    not tested
  • 12Elecshion 65W two-port
    not tested
  • 13TOPADRE 140W, five-port with digital display
    not tested
  • 14MINIX 165W four-port, one port rated 140W
    not tested
  • 15Anker 747, 150W four-port
    not tested
  • 16Anker 200W six-port desktop station
    not tested
  • 17UGREEN 160W total output
    not tested

How it was tested

  • standby (idle) power draw
  • single-device charging power ramp at the start, 5 minutes, and 30 minutes, measured at both the wall outlet and the receiving power bank, with charger efficiency computed from the difference
  • charger surface/case temperature after 30 minutes of single-device charging
  • physical size in cubic inches, compared within wattage tier
  • wall-outlet pullout/retention force measured with a force gauge, compared within wattage tier (corded chargers skipped)
  • maximum simultaneous multi-device output using all ports at once, with resulting temperature and any wattage drop under sustained load
  • efficiency and temperature under the multi-device max-output test, compared within wattage tier

More Gadgets & Tech

Gadgets & Tech2026

Which Phone Case Brand Wins?

Mous

See the results
Gadgets & Tech2026

Which Thermal Imaging Camera Brand Wins?

HSFTOOLS HF96

See the results
Gadgets & Tech2026

Which Hidden Camera Detectors Brand Wins?

JMDHKK M8000

See the results