Windshield Water Repellent 2024 Test: Which Brand Wins?
2024 test10 productsCar Care & Detailing

Windshield Water Repellent 2024 Test: Which Brand Wins?

This 2024 head-to-head test of 10 windshield water repellent options has the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.

The verdict
Rain-X
Budget pick

Rain-X

Price shown in test: $10 for two 3.5 oz containers (about $10 for 7 oz total)

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.

Slickness Test

  • 1Rain-X
    2 lb

    of force to slide the weighted sponge (versus 3.5 lb untreated)

  • 2Invisible Glass
    2.6 lb

    of force to slide the weighted sponge

  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
    1.1 lb2nd

    of force, described as 'by far the slickest yet' at that point in testing, about a pound less than Rain-X; finished 2nd overall in the closing slickness leaderboard

  • 43D
    1.6 lb2nd

    of force, moved into 2nd place at that point in testing; finished tied for 3rd overall in the closing slickness leaderboard alongside G-Techniq

  • 5CERAKOTE
    2.4 lb

    of force, about the same as Invisible Glass

  • 6G-Techniq G5
    1.6 lb2nd

    of force, tied with 3D for 2nd place at that point in testing; finished tied for 3rd overall in the closing slickness leaderboard

  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
    1 lb

    of force, described as 'super slick,' the best (lowest) result of all 10 brands and the closing slickness leaderboard's overall winner

  • 8Aquapel
    4.2 lb

    of force, described as 'even less slick than the untreated glass' (worse than the 3.5 lb untreated baseline)

  • 9Debaishi
    1.8 lb

    of force, performed better than Aquapel

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
    4.3 lb

    of force, described as 'the most force yet,' the worst (highest) result of all 10 brands

Hydrophobic Bead Test Heavy Spray

  • 1Rain-X

    amazing hydrophobic qualities, water forming very tight beads; finished 3rd overall in this test behind Aquapel and GYEON (tied 1st)

  • 2Invisible Glass

    water mostly forming a sheet rather than beading, described as performing worse than Rain-X

  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0

    definitely a better job than Invisible Glass but not quite as good as Rain-X

  • 43D

    about the same as Invisible Glass, not quite as good as Rain-X or Adams

  • 5CERAKOTE

    performing well, but water beginning to form a sheet under the direct path of the spray; described as clearly worse than GYEON in a direct side-by-side

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    very good, almost as good as Rain-X, in 2nd place at that point in testing, clearly better than 3D

  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View

    clearly loses to GYEON in a direct side-by-side comparison ('the gion is definitely doing a much better job with water immediately forming very tight beads')

  • 8Aquapel

    performing extremely well, tight beads across the entire test area, easily beat Chemical Guys; tied with GYEON for 1st place overall in this test

  • 9Debaishi

    really struggling, water forming a sheet across the entire test area; clear loss to Aquapel

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    doing the best job so far in the heavy-spray test, water forming very tight beads, unable to form a sheet; beat CERAKOTE and Chemical Guys decisively; tied with Aquapel for 1st place overall in this test

Washer Fluid Durability

  • 1Rain-X

    still works as good as new

  • 2Invisible Glass

    sheet of water took about half a second longer to dissipate

  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0

    performing very well, seemed unphased by the windshield washer fluid

  • 43D

    a lot of damage, over 8 seconds for the sheet of water to dissipate

  • 5CERAKOTE

    sheet of water now taking 2 seconds longer to dissipate

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    still looks as good as new

  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View

    now taking an extra 3 seconds to break up the sheet of water

  • 8Aquapel

    performing as good as new

  • 9Debaishi

    just about used up at 18 seconds after only brief exposure, the worst result of all 10 brands in this test

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    continues to do an amazing job forming tight water beads (essentially unaffected)

Car Wash Durability

  • 1Rain-X

    still looks as good as new

  • 2Invisible Glass

    needed an extra 2 seconds for the sheet of water to run off

  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0

    took some damage, 1.5 seconds for the sheet of water to dissipate

  • 43D

    a lot of damage, went from 9 seconds to 26 seconds

  • 5CERAKOTE

    went from 3.3 seconds to 5.7 seconds after the car wash and scrubber

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    looks just as good as Rain-X, nothing but water beads

  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View

    really lost a lot of performance, going from 4.3 seconds to 12 seconds

  • 8Aquapel

    still repelling water just as good as new

  • 9Debaishi

    really struggling, very close to a minute for the sheet of water to clear the test area, the worst result of all 10 brands

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    still doing an amazing job, water unable to form a sheet (essentially unaffected)

Bug Guts Removal Test

  • 1Rain-X

    performed well with just a small amount of unfinished business

  • 2Invisible Glass

    didn't perform quite as well as Rain-X, some bug guts still on the test piece

  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0

    about the same as Invisible Glass

  • 43D

    streaks of bug guts running across the glass panel ('that familiar streak')

  • 5CERAKOTE

    performed about the same as Invisible Glass and Adams, plenty of leftover residue

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    performed quite a bit better than average, just a small amount of bug guts still on the panel

  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View

    quite a bit of bug gut still left on the test piece

  • 8Aquapel

    most bug guts came off but there are still some dissolved bug gut streaks

  • 9Debaishi

    did a great job removing the marker stain but really struggled with the bug guts

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    did a pretty good job with the bug gut remains

Marker Stain Removal Test

  • 1Rain-X

    black marker has been removed

  • 2Invisible Glass

    black marker has been removed

  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0

    permanent marker removed

  • 43D

    black marker removed ('did a great job')

  • 5CERAKOTE

    black marker did not survive the test (removed)

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    black marker lifted away from the glass during the test

  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View

    quite a bit of permanent marker survived the test

  • 8Aquapel

    a shadow of the marker still visible on the glass (not fully removed)

  • 9Debaishi

    marker stain removed ('did a great job')

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    some permanent marker remains still visible (not fully removed)

Heat Durability Test Bracket

  • 1Rain-X

    beat Adams (slight edge), 3D (easy win), Chemical Guys (easy win), and CERAKOTE, but lost to G-Techniq ('the g technique finally handed the rainx a loss'); finished 4th overall in this bracket-style heat test behind the 3-way tie of G-Techniq, Aquapel, and GYEON

  • 2Invisible Glass

    eliminated early; described only in a side comparison as performing worse than CERAKOTE ('the cerakote did perform better than the invisible glass and the 3D')

  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0

    lost to Rain-X, described as 'extremely close' with Rain-X having only a slight edge

  • 43D

    lost to Rain-X, described as an 'easy win for the rainx'

  • 5CERAKOTE

    lost to Rain-X ('rainx outperformed the cerakote'), but performed better than Invisible Glass and 3D in a side comparison

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    the only brand to beat Rain-X in the heat-resistance bracket; then tied with Aquapel ('too close to call'); finished in a 3-way tie for 1st place overall in this test alongside Aquapel and GYEON

  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View

    lost to Rain-X, described as an 'easy win for the rainx'

  • 8Aquapel

    tied with G-Techniq ('too close to call'), easily beat Debaishi, then tied with GYEON ('too close to call... both brands perform very well'); finished in a 3-way tie for 1st place overall alongside G-Techniq and GYEON

  • 9Debaishi

    lost easily to Aquapel

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    outperformed CERAKOTE in a side comparison, then tied with Aquapel ('too close to call... both brands perform very well'); finished in a 3-way tie for 1st place overall alongside G-Techniq and Aquapel

Bug Tar Remover Test Top 4 Only

  • 1Rain-X

    water beading and beginning to form lines when running off

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    still forming water beads but water forming water lines when running off, similar to Rain-X

  • 8Aquapel

    performing about the same as Rain-X

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    definitely forming the tightest water beads of all the top-4 brands after this exposure

  • 2Invisible Glass
    not tested
  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
    not tested
  • 43D
    not tested
  • 5CERAKOTE
    not tested
  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
    not tested
  • 9Debaishi
    not tested
All measurements (3 more)+

Wheel Tire Cleaner Test Top 4 Only

  • 1Rain-X

    definitely had an impact, water beads now forming water trails

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    looks very close to the same as Rain-X, water beads forming pretty long water trails

  • 8Aquapel

    performing the best so far, most water beads running off the glass without forming water lines

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    outperforming Rain-X and G-Techniq by just a little in a close race

  • 2Invisible Glass
    not tested
  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
    not tested
  • 43D
    not tested
  • 5CERAKOTE
    not tested
  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
    not tested
  • 9Debaishi
    not tested

Degreaser Test Top 4 Only

  • 1Rain-X

    more water trails, trails becoming longer

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    performing about the same as Rain-X, pretty long water trails

  • 8Aquapel

    performing a little bit better than GYEON, but described as a very close competition between the two

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)

    some water trails, but performing better than Rain-X and G-Techniq

  • 2Invisible Glass
    not tested
  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
    not tested
  • 43D
    not tested
  • 5CERAKOTE
    not tested
  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
    not tested
  • 9Debaishi
    not tested

Blow Dryer Test Top 4 Only

  • 1Rain-X

    tied for 3rd (last) place among the top 4 at very close to 2 seconds, alongside G-Techniq

  • 6G-Techniq G5

    tied for 3rd (last) place among the top 4 at very close to 2 seconds, alongside Rain-X

  • 8Aquapel

    came out on top of all 4 remaining brands at 0.6 seconds

  • 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
    2nd place

    among the top 4 at just over 1.1 seconds

  • 2Invisible Glass
    not tested
  • 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
    not tested
  • 43D
    not tested
  • 5CERAKOTE
    not tested
  • 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
    not tested
  • 9Debaishi
    not tested

How it was tested

  • slickness test (force in lb to slide a 5 lb weighted sponge across the treated glass panel)
  • hydrophobic beading test on an actual car windshield (light mist, then heavy spray)
  • windshield washer fluid durability test (2 sponge passes, time for water sheet to dissipate)
  • car wash detergent and scrubber durability test (5 passes)
  • bug and tar remover exposure test (top 4 finalists only)
  • wheel and tire cleaner exposure test (top 4 finalists only)
  • degreaser exposure test (top 4 finalists only)
  • blow dryer test, fan only at approximately 40 mph (top 4 finalists only, time to clear water droplets)
  • insect splatter (bug guts) removal test with windshield washer fluid and squeegee passes, all 10 brands
  • permanent marker stain removal test, all 10 brands
  • heat/hot water durability test (dishwasher at approximately 130 F for 2.5 hours, no detergent, bracket-style elimination comparisons)

the g technique in aquapel tied for first place with an average finish of 1.3

From the test video verdict.

More Car Care & Detailing