
Windshield Water Repellent 2024 Test: Which Brand Wins?
This 2024 head-to-head test of 10 windshield water repellent options has the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.

Rain-X
Price shown in test: $10 for two 3.5 oz containers (about $10 for 7 oz total)
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.
Slickness Test
- 1Rain-X2 lb
of force to slide the weighted sponge (versus 3.5 lb untreated)
- 2Invisible Glass2.6 lb
of force to slide the weighted sponge
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.01.1 lb2nd
of force, described as 'by far the slickest yet' at that point in testing, about a pound less than Rain-X; finished 2nd overall in the closing slickness leaderboard
- 43D1.6 lb2nd
of force, moved into 2nd place at that point in testing; finished tied for 3rd overall in the closing slickness leaderboard alongside G-Techniq
- 5CERAKOTE2.4 lb
of force, about the same as Invisible Glass
- 6G-Techniq G51.6 lb2nd
of force, tied with 3D for 2nd place at that point in testing; finished tied for 3rd overall in the closing slickness leaderboard
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro View1 lb
of force, described as 'super slick,' the best (lowest) result of all 10 brands and the closing slickness leaderboard's overall winner
- 8Aquapel4.2 lb
of force, described as 'even less slick than the untreated glass' (worse than the 3.5 lb untreated baseline)
- 9Debaishi1.8 lb
of force, performed better than Aquapel
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)4.3 lb
of force, described as 'the most force yet,' the worst (highest) result of all 10 brands
Hydrophobic Bead Test Heavy Spray
- 1Rain-X
amazing hydrophobic qualities, water forming very tight beads; finished 3rd overall in this test behind Aquapel and GYEON (tied 1st)
- 2Invisible Glass
water mostly forming a sheet rather than beading, described as performing worse than Rain-X
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
definitely a better job than Invisible Glass but not quite as good as Rain-X
- 43D
about the same as Invisible Glass, not quite as good as Rain-X or Adams
- 5CERAKOTE
performing well, but water beginning to form a sheet under the direct path of the spray; described as clearly worse than GYEON in a direct side-by-side
- 6G-Techniq G5
very good, almost as good as Rain-X, in 2nd place at that point in testing, clearly better than 3D
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
clearly loses to GYEON in a direct side-by-side comparison ('the gion is definitely doing a much better job with water immediately forming very tight beads')
- 8Aquapel
performing extremely well, tight beads across the entire test area, easily beat Chemical Guys; tied with GYEON for 1st place overall in this test
- 9Debaishi
really struggling, water forming a sheet across the entire test area; clear loss to Aquapel
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
doing the best job so far in the heavy-spray test, water forming very tight beads, unable to form a sheet; beat CERAKOTE and Chemical Guys decisively; tied with Aquapel for 1st place overall in this test
Washer Fluid Durability
- 1Rain-X
still works as good as new
- 2Invisible Glass
sheet of water took about half a second longer to dissipate
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
performing very well, seemed unphased by the windshield washer fluid
- 43D
a lot of damage, over 8 seconds for the sheet of water to dissipate
- 5CERAKOTE
sheet of water now taking 2 seconds longer to dissipate
- 6G-Techniq G5
still looks as good as new
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
now taking an extra 3 seconds to break up the sheet of water
- 8Aquapel
performing as good as new
- 9Debaishi
just about used up at 18 seconds after only brief exposure, the worst result of all 10 brands in this test
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
continues to do an amazing job forming tight water beads (essentially unaffected)
Car Wash Durability
- 1Rain-X
still looks as good as new
- 2Invisible Glass
needed an extra 2 seconds for the sheet of water to run off
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
took some damage, 1.5 seconds for the sheet of water to dissipate
- 43D
a lot of damage, went from 9 seconds to 26 seconds
- 5CERAKOTE
went from 3.3 seconds to 5.7 seconds after the car wash and scrubber
- 6G-Techniq G5
looks just as good as Rain-X, nothing but water beads
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
really lost a lot of performance, going from 4.3 seconds to 12 seconds
- 8Aquapel
still repelling water just as good as new
- 9Debaishi
really struggling, very close to a minute for the sheet of water to clear the test area, the worst result of all 10 brands
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
still doing an amazing job, water unable to form a sheet (essentially unaffected)
Bug Guts Removal Test
- 1Rain-X
performed well with just a small amount of unfinished business
- 2Invisible Glass
didn't perform quite as well as Rain-X, some bug guts still on the test piece
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
about the same as Invisible Glass
- 43D
streaks of bug guts running across the glass panel ('that familiar streak')
- 5CERAKOTE
performed about the same as Invisible Glass and Adams, plenty of leftover residue
- 6G-Techniq G5
performed quite a bit better than average, just a small amount of bug guts still on the panel
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
quite a bit of bug gut still left on the test piece
- 8Aquapel
most bug guts came off but there are still some dissolved bug gut streaks
- 9Debaishi
did a great job removing the marker stain but really struggled with the bug guts
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
did a pretty good job with the bug gut remains
Marker Stain Removal Test
- 1Rain-X
black marker has been removed
- 2Invisible Glass
black marker has been removed
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
permanent marker removed
- 43D
black marker removed ('did a great job')
- 5CERAKOTE
black marker did not survive the test (removed)
- 6G-Techniq G5
black marker lifted away from the glass during the test
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
quite a bit of permanent marker survived the test
- 8Aquapel
a shadow of the marker still visible on the glass (not fully removed)
- 9Debaishi
marker stain removed ('did a great job')
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
some permanent marker remains still visible (not fully removed)
Heat Durability Test Bracket
- 1Rain-X
beat Adams (slight edge), 3D (easy win), Chemical Guys (easy win), and CERAKOTE, but lost to G-Techniq ('the g technique finally handed the rainx a loss'); finished 4th overall in this bracket-style heat test behind the 3-way tie of G-Techniq, Aquapel, and GYEON
- 2Invisible Glass
eliminated early; described only in a side comparison as performing worse than CERAKOTE ('the cerakote did perform better than the invisible glass and the 3D')
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0
lost to Rain-X, described as 'extremely close' with Rain-X having only a slight edge
- 43D
lost to Rain-X, described as an 'easy win for the rainx'
- 5CERAKOTE
lost to Rain-X ('rainx outperformed the cerakote'), but performed better than Invisible Glass and 3D in a side comparison
- 6G-Techniq G5
the only brand to beat Rain-X in the heat-resistance bracket; then tied with Aquapel ('too close to call'); finished in a 3-way tie for 1st place overall in this test alongside Aquapel and GYEON
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro View
lost to Rain-X, described as an 'easy win for the rainx'
- 8Aquapel
tied with G-Techniq ('too close to call'), easily beat Debaishi, then tied with GYEON ('too close to call... both brands perform very well'); finished in a 3-way tie for 1st place overall alongside G-Techniq and GYEON
- 9Debaishi
lost easily to Aquapel
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
outperformed CERAKOTE in a side comparison, then tied with Aquapel ('too close to call... both brands perform very well'); finished in a 3-way tie for 1st place overall alongside G-Techniq and Aquapel
Bug Tar Remover Test Top 4 Only
- 1Rain-X
water beading and beginning to form lines when running off
- 6G-Techniq G5
still forming water beads but water forming water lines when running off, similar to Rain-X
- 8Aquapel
performing about the same as Rain-X
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
definitely forming the tightest water beads of all the top-4 brands after this exposure
- 2Invisible Glassnot tested
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0not tested
- 43Dnot tested
- 5CERAKOTEnot tested
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro Viewnot tested
- 9Debaishinot tested
All measurements (3 more)+
Wheel Tire Cleaner Test Top 4 Only
- 1Rain-X
definitely had an impact, water beads now forming water trails
- 6G-Techniq G5
looks very close to the same as Rain-X, water beads forming pretty long water trails
- 8Aquapel
performing the best so far, most water beads running off the glass without forming water lines
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
outperforming Rain-X and G-Techniq by just a little in a close race
- 2Invisible Glassnot tested
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0not tested
- 43Dnot tested
- 5CERAKOTEnot tested
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro Viewnot tested
- 9Debaishinot tested
Degreaser Test Top 4 Only
- 1Rain-X
more water trails, trails becoming longer
- 6G-Techniq G5
performing about the same as Rain-X, pretty long water trails
- 8Aquapel
performing a little bit better than GYEON, but described as a very close competition between the two
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)
some water trails, but performing better than Rain-X and G-Techniq
- 2Invisible Glassnot tested
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0not tested
- 43Dnot tested
- 5CERAKOTEnot tested
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro Viewnot tested
- 9Debaishinot tested
Blow Dryer Test Top 4 Only
- 1Rain-X
tied for 3rd (last) place among the top 4 at very close to 2 seconds, alongside G-Techniq
- 6G-Techniq G5
tied for 3rd (last) place among the top 4 at very close to 2 seconds, alongside Rain-X
- 8Aquapel
came out on top of all 4 remaining brands at 0.6 seconds
- 10GYEON Q² View (transcript renders the brand and product name as 'guy on'/'gion'/'Guion,' resolved to GYEON per the description)2nd place
among the top 4 at just over 1.1 seconds
- 2Invisible Glassnot tested
- 3Adams Glass Sealant 2.0not tested
- 43Dnot tested
- 5CERAKOTEnot tested
- 7Chemical Guys Hydro Viewnot tested
- 9Debaishinot tested
How it was tested
- slickness test (force in lb to slide a 5 lb weighted sponge across the treated glass panel)
- hydrophobic beading test on an actual car windshield (light mist, then heavy spray)
- windshield washer fluid durability test (2 sponge passes, time for water sheet to dissipate)
- car wash detergent and scrubber durability test (5 passes)
- bug and tar remover exposure test (top 4 finalists only)
- wheel and tire cleaner exposure test (top 4 finalists only)
- degreaser exposure test (top 4 finalists only)
- blow dryer test, fan only at approximately 40 mph (top 4 finalists only, time to clear water droplets)
- insect splatter (bug guts) removal test with windshield washer fluid and squeegee passes, all 10 brands
- permanent marker stain removal test, all 10 brands
- heat/hot water durability test (dishwasher at approximately 130 F for 2.5 hours, no detergent, bracket-style elimination comparisons)
“the g technique in aquapel tied for first place with an average finish of 1.3”


