Which Headlamp Brand Wins?
2024 test18 productsFlashlights & Lighting

Which Headlamp Brand Wins?

In our test we compared 18 headlamp options head to head. Fenix came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.

The verdict
Fenix
Winner

Fenix

Price shown in test: $121

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Wurkkos
Budget pick

Wurkkos

Price shown in test: $53

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The quick take

The short version of why each pick lands where it does, built straight from the measured results.

WinnerFenix$121

If I could only pick one headlamp, I would definitely buy the Fenix. It has a great battery and earned As in every category except for run time.

Best in 2 of 9 measurements, including Beam Quality and Comfort Rating.

Budget pickWurkkos$53

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.

Brightness 15 Min Lm

  • 1Fenix
    1,216

    (brightest of all headlamps at 15 minutes)

  • 2Coast
    210

    (headlamp automatically lowered power setting after overheating)

  • 3Wurkkos
    474
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    271
  • 5Nebo
    329
  • 6Ledlenser
    9712nd

    (second best sustained brightness after Fenix)

  • 7Amaker
    528
  • 8Sofirn
    637
  • 9Millertech
    543
  • 10Zmoon
    661
  • 11Zebralight
    693

    held up best of any headlamp with the smallest 15 minute dropoff

  • 12Princeton Tec
    632
  • 13Bud K
    439

    described as having overheated

  • 14Olight
    around424
  • 15Lepro
    496
  • 16Danforce
    221

    described as not very much light

  • 17Odear
    288
  • 18Mioisy
    133

Temp 15 (min)

  • 1Fenix

    pretty hot at 114 F

  • 2Coast

    pretty hot at 132.2 F

  • 3Wurkkos

    a little bit hot at around 114 F

  • 4Nitecore HC68
    around122 F
  • 5Nebo

    a little bit warm at 102 F

  • 6Ledlenser

    pretty hot at 124 F

  • 7Amaker
    around99 F
  • 8Sofirn

    pretty hot at 126 F

  • 9Millertech

    pretty hot at 127 F

  • 10Zmoon

    by far the hottest at 154 F

  • 11Zebralight

    pretty hot at 125 F

  • 12Princeton Tec
    around130 F
  • 13Bud K
    around105 F
  • 14Olight
    91 F
  • 15Lepro
    around95 F
  • 16Danforce

    a little bit warm at around 109 F

  • 17Odear
    around80 F
  • 18Mioisy
    around97 F

Weight (g)

  • 1Fenix
    207.71 g
  • 2Coast
    225.59 g
  • 3Wurkkos
    just over211 g
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    just over169 g
  • 5Nebo
    164.17 g
  • 6Ledlenser
    just over400 g
  • 7Amaker
    396.91 g

    (very heavy)

  • 8Sofirn
    169.43 g
  • 9Millertech
    125.3 g
  • 10Zmoon
    380.46 g

    by far the heaviest headlamp tested

  • 11Zebralight
    127.94 g

    extremely light

  • 12Princeton Tec
    262.66 g
  • 13Bud K
    371.59 g
  • 14Olight
    220.13 g
  • 15Lepro
    153.07 g
  • 16Danforce
    just under265 g
  • 17Odear
    164.15 g
  • 18Mioisy
    just over150 g

Initial Brightness Lm

  • 1Fenix
    2,953

    (better than its 2,700 rating)

  • 2Coast
    2,373

    (exceeded its 2,075 rating)

  • 3Wurkkos
    2,330
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    2,165

    (better than its 2,000 rating)

  • 5Nebo
    2,081
  • 6Ledlenser
    1,878

    (well below its 4,000 rating)

  • 7Amaker
    1,614
  • 8Sofirn
    1,563
  • 9Millertech
    1,132
  • 10Zmoon
    812

    (well below its 100,000 lm claim)

  • 11Zebralight
    713
  • 12Princeton Tec
    just over700

    (better than its 550 rating)

  • 13Bud K
    1,221
  • 15Lepro
    just over670

    described as more than twice as bright as the Odear

  • 16Danforce
    334
  • 17Odear
    315

    (well below its 40,000 lm claim)

  • 18Mioisy
    239

    (well below its 20,000 lm claim)

  • 14Olight
    not tested

Brightness 30 S Lm

  • 1Fenix
    2,187

    (below its 2,700 rating)

  • 2Coast
    2,164
  • 3Wurkkos
    around2,000
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    2,115
  • 5Nebo
    1,985
  • 6Ledlenser
    1,854
  • 7Amaker
    1,503
  • 8Sofirn
    1,115
  • 9Millertech
    1,106
  • 10Zmoon
    785
  • 11Zebralight
    710
  • 12Princeton Tec
    just under700
  • 13Bud K
    1,135
  • 15Lepro
    653
  • 16Danforce
    322
  • 17Odear
    309
  • 18Mioisy
    199
  • 14Olight
    not tested

Battery Capacity Test

  • 1Fenix

    rated 5,000 mA hours, actual 4,890 mA hours, second place among 21700 cells behind Wurkkos

  • 2Coast

    rated 4,000 mA hours, actual 3,780 mA hours, barely outlasted Olight

  • 3Wurkkos

    rated 5,000 mA hours, actual 4,927 mA hours, best capacity among the four 21700 cells tested (Fenix second at 4,890)

  • 4Nitecore HC68

    rated 3,500 mA hours, actual 3,363 mA hours

  • 5Nebo

    rated 3,200 mA hours, actual 3,267 mA hours, beat its own rating

  • 7Amaker

    rated 3,000 mA hours, came up over 600 mA short of rating, graded a C

  • 8Sofirn

    rated 3,000 mA hours, surpassed its rating (exact figure not stated)

  • 9Millertech

    rated 3,500 mA hours, actual 3,238 mA hours

  • 11Zebralight

    rated 3,000 mA hours, actual 2,821 mA hours

  • 13Bud K

    rated a low 1,200 mA hours, actual 1,217 mA hours, met its rating but called awful for an 18650 cell

  • 14Olight

    rated 4,000 mA hours, actual 3,750 mA hours

  • 15Lepro

    advertised 2,200 mA hours, actual 2,564 mA hours, called pretty good for a budget headlamp

  • 6Ledlenser
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 12Princeton Tec
    not tested
  • 16Danforce
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested

Beam Quality

  • 1Fenix

    best possible rating of 1 for focused beam (tied with Olight, Zebralight, Ledlenser); best possible rating of 1 for broad beam (only headlamp to earn this)

  • 2Coast
    1.5

    rating for broad beam (tied with Nitecore and Ledlenser)

  • 4Nitecore HC68
    1.5

    rating for broad beam (tied with Coast and Ledlenser)

  • 6Ledlenser
    1.5

    rating for broad beam (tied with Coast and Nitecore)

  • 11Zebralight

    best possible rating of 1 for focused beam (tied with Olight, Fenix, Ledlenser)

  • 14Olight

    best possible rating of 1 for focused beam (tied with Zebralight, Fenix, Ledlenser)

  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 7Amaker
    not tested
  • 8Sofirn
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 12Princeton Tec
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 16Danforce
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested

Light Throw

  • 1Fenix

    did not place in top three throw distances (Zebralight 129 m, Amaker 57 m, Danforce 46 m named)

  • 7Amaker
    57 m2nd

    throw distance (10 lux assumption), second best of named throw leaders

  • 11Zebralight
    129 m

    best throw distance of the group (10 lux assumption)

  • 16Danforce
    46 m

    throw distance (10 lux assumption), third among named throw leaders

  • 2Coast
    not tested
  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 6Ledlenser
    not tested
  • 8Sofirn
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 12Princeton Tec
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 14Olight
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested
All measurements (6 more)+

Total Lm Over Time

  • 1Fenix
    3,131 lm3rd

    cumulative, third place behind Ledlenser (4,103) and Princeton Tec (3,260)

  • 6Ledlenser
    4,103 lm

    cumulative, tops the list (Princeton Tec second at 3,260, Fenix third at 3,131)

  • 12Princeton Tec
    3,260 lm2nd

    cumulative, second place behind Ledlenser (4,103)

  • 2Coast
    not tested
  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 7Amaker
    not tested
  • 8Sofirn
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 11Zebralight
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 14Olight
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 16Danforce
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested

Comfort Rating

  • 1Fenix

    best possible rating of 1, most comfortable headlamp

  • 4Nitecore HC68
    1.5

    rating, very comfortable (tied with Sofirn)

  • 8Sofirn
    1.5

    rating, very comfortable (tied with Nitecore)

  • 2Coast
    not tested
  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 6Ledlenser
    not tested
  • 7Amaker
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 11Zebralight
    not tested
  • 12Princeton Tec
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 14Olight
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 16Danforce
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested

Max Current Test

  • 2Coast
    18 A1st

    first place among headlamps tested for max current (Olight 17 A, Nitecore 15 A)

  • 4Nitecore HC68
    15 A3rd

    third place among headlamps tested for max current

  • 14Olight
    17 A2nd

    second place among headlamps tested for max current

  • 1Fenix
    not tested
  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 6Ledlenser
    not tested
  • 7Amaker
    not tested
  • 8Sofirn
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 11Zebralight
    not tested
  • 12Princeton Tec
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 16Danforce
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested

Visibility

  • 7Amaker

    decent visibility at around 75 ft on medium zoom

  • 16Danforce
    around25 ft

    of visibility on medium zoom, focused zoom barely adequate at 75 ft

  • 18Mioisy

    only about 15 ft of good visibility

  • 1Fenix
    not tested
  • 2Coast
    not tested
  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 6Ledlenser
    not tested
  • 8Sofirn
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 11Zebralight
    not tested
  • 12Princeton Tec
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 14Olight
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested

Run Time

  • 2Coast

    lasted about 9.5 hours on highest setting, best run time of the group

  • 12Princeton Tec

    lasted about 9 hours on highest setting, second best run time after Coast

  • 1Fenix
    not tested
  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 6Ledlenser
    not tested
  • 7Amaker
    not tested
  • 8Sofirn
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 11Zebralight
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 14Olight
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 16Danforce
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested

Medium Width Beam

  • 1Fenix

    amazing visibility at around 150 ft, best of the group

  • 2Coast
    not tested
  • 3Wurkkos
    not tested
  • 4Nitecore HC68
    not tested
  • 5Nebo
    not tested
  • 6Ledlenser
    not tested
  • 7Amaker
    not tested
  • 8Sofirn
    not tested
  • 9Millertech
    not tested
  • 10Zmoon
    not tested
  • 11Zebralight
    not tested
  • 12Princeton Tec
    not tested
  • 13Bud K
    not tested
  • 14Olight
    not tested
  • 15Lepro
    not tested
  • 16Danforce
    not tested
  • 17Odear
    not tested
  • 18Mioisy
    not tested

How it was tested

  • initial, 30 second, and 15 minute brightness measured in lumens with a light meter
  • beam temperature after 15 minutes of use
  • weight
  • hot spot and spill visibility assessment at set distances
  • battery capacity test (mA hours) versus advertised rating
  • battery maximum current draw test (amps) for select removable-battery units
  • light throw distance in meters using a 10 lux assumption
  • subjective beam quality rating for focused and broad beam (1 is best)
  • medium width beam visibility distance
  • run time until brightness could no longer be sustained
  • cumulative total lumens produced across the full test duration
  • subjective comfort rating
  • drop test from 4, 5, and 6 feet onto concrete
  • battery cell voltage sag test at increasing amperage (Ultrafire cell vs Nitecore's own 18650, used only as a battery-quality demonstration, not a headlamp ranking)

If I could only pick one headlamp, I would definitely buy the Fenix. It has a great battery and earned As in every category except for run time.

From the test video verdict.
Data notes and caveats

18-headlamp mega comparison (this channel's Products Tested list confirms all 18: Fenix, Coast, Nitecore, Wurkkos, NEBO, Ledlenser, Olight, Amaker, Bud K, Sofirn, Millertech, Zmoon, Zebralight, Princeton Tec, Lepro, Danforce, ODEAR, Mioisy). Several brand names were caption mangled and resolved against the description/tags list and, for Wurkkos, the narrator's own later self-correction: Moosy to Mioisy, Leapro to Lepro, Zeemoon to Zmoon, Miltec/Millertec to Millertech, Workos to Wurkkos. The video does not give one single composite rank across every metric; products[] here is ordered by initial brightness in lumens (the one metric measured for nearly every unit) as a derived, verbatim-sourced ordering, not a rank the video itself declared. The narrator's closing section instead gives an overall pick (Fenix, directly quoted), a compact and value pick (Wurkkos), and an adjustable-lens category pick (Amaker); those are preserved as the winner, budgetPick, and in Amaker's notes respectively. Two genuine data gaps are flagged rather than guessed: Olight has no initial or 30 second brightness figure due to a self-dimming feature, and the Zebralight is said to ship without a battery but is later given a battery capacity result, an unresolved contradiction in the source video. The Ultrafire battery appearing late in the video is a battery-brand quality demo used for comparison, not one of the 18 tested headlamps, and is excluded from products[].

More Flashlights & Lighting