Which Tarps Brand Wins?
2025 test14 productsHome & Cleaning

Which Tarps Brand Wins?

In our test we compared 14 tarps options head to head. CAMPMAC Super HD came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.

The verdict
CAMPMAC Super HD
Winner

CAMPMAC Super HD

Price shown in test: $50

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

CAMPMAC HD
Runner-up

CAMPMAC HD

Price shown in test: $50

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Rugged Rhino
Budget pick

Rugged Rhino

Price shown in test: $26 for two tarps, or $13 each

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The quick take

The short version of why each pick lands where it does, built straight from the measured results.

WinnerCAMPMAC Super HD$50

It's definitely by far the best tarp and it should last for many years

Best in 6 of 11 measurements, including UV resistance rating, Water protection rating and Grommet strength, new.

Runner-upCAMPMAC HD$50

Best in 6 of 11 measurements, including UV resistance rating, Water protection rating and Grommet strength, new.

Budget pickRugged Rhino$26 for two tarps, or $13 each

Placed top three in 1 of 9 measurements.

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.

Claimed thickness

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD

    not stated as a mil rating; claims waterproof, UV resistant, dust resistant, tear resistant, all weather, wear proof

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    12 mil

    (claimed), metal grommets every 20 in

  • 3Patiobay
    14 mil

    (claimed), brass grommets, rip and tear proof, reinforced edges, UV resistant

  • 4Rugged Rhino
    5 mil

    (claimed), waterproof with extreme protection in all weather

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    10 mil

    (claimed), all weather, tear and fade resistant, double laminated, grommets every 18 in

  • 6Amazon Basics

    not stated as a mil rating; claims designed for camping, waterproof design, durable ripstop fabric, reinforced corners and edges

  • 7Cartman
    8 mil

    (claimed), waterproof, rip and tear resistant, UV resistant, strong grommets

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    12 mil

    (claimed), 14 by 14 tightly woven strands per square inch, superior tensile strength and tear resistance

  • 9Zuperia

    not stated as a mil rating; claims waterproof, repellent, breathable, ideal for covering anything outdoors

  • 10Grizzly
    5 mil

    (claimed), true 8 by 8 weave, waterproof, mildew proof, washable

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    4 mil

    (claimed); rust resistant grommets, rot and tear resistant, claims to be waterproof

  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    7 mil

    (claimed); rust resistant aluminum grommets approximately every 3 ft; quality rated between good and best

  • 13VEVOR
    5 mil

    (claimed), advertised as 10 by 12 ft, claims UV protection and strong waterproofing, marketed as tough tools for half the price

  • 14Foremost Cut

    not stated as a mil rating; claims rip resistant woven fabric, good quality

Weight

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    6,710 g

    by far the heaviest of all 14 tarps

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    2,008 g
  • 3Patiobay
    2,190 g

    heaviest of the first 12 tarps introduced

  • 4Rugged Rhino
    1,196 g

    heaviest yet at the point it was introduced

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    1,956 g
  • 6Amazon Basics
    1,038 g
  • 7Cartman
    1,094 g

    heaviest yet at the point it was introduced

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    2,130 g

    by far the heaviest of the first 12 tarps introduced

  • 9Zuperia
    4,192 g
  • 10Grizzly
    796 g
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    1,048 g
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    878 g
  • 13VEVOR
    754 g

    very light

  • 14Foremost Cut
    702 g

Country of origin

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD

    China

  • 2CAMPMAC HD

    China

  • 3Patiobay

    China

  • 4Rugged Rhino

    China

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series

    China

  • 6Amazon Basics

    China

  • 7Cartman

    China

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme

    China

  • 9Zuperia

    China

  • 10Grizzly

    Vietnam

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty

    China

  • 12Foremost Dry Top

    Vietnam

  • 13VEVOR

    China

  • 14Foremost Cut

    Vietnam

Condition near 1 year

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD

    holding up very well from the wind as well as the UV exposure

  • 2CAMPMAC HD

    looking great on the wind exposed side; the sun exposed side is beginning to experience cracks in the vinyl coating

  • 3Patiobay

    holding up well from wind, but direct sunlight caused even more damage than the Amazon Basics; coating rubbing away very easily

  • 4Rugged Rhino

    definitely doing the best so far, looks almost as good as new on both sun and wind exposed sides

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series

    still holding up better than the Harbor Freight Extreme, but feeling a little more gritty as the vinyl coating is at the early stages of breaking down

  • 6Amazon Basics

    feels nice and smooth on the wind exposed side, but the sun exposed side is feeling pretty gritty as the vinyl coating breaks down

  • 7Cartman

    performed about the same as the Harbor Freight Light Duty for sun exposure; held up really well to wind but has a hole from rubbing against hay stubble

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme

    holding up very well to wind, but sun exposure causing a tremendous amount of damage to the coating

  • 9Zuperia

    other than some additional fading, still looks good on both sides

  • 10Grizzly

    still not looking too tough, breaking down pretty badly from UV exposure; wind exposed side held up fairly well but appears to be breaking down

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty

    a few tears, beginning to break down from UV exposure; wind exposed side held up fairly well; a few tiny holes

  • 12Foremost Dry Top

    continued to hold up well from wind, but UV exposure caused severe cracking in the vinyl coating as well as some holes

  • 13VEVOR

    less than 6 months old but looks several years old on both sides; a massive hole has formed and the vinyl coating is badly damaged

  • 14Foremost Cut

    in by far the worst shape of all 14 tarps, described as probably worse than not having a tarp at all since it holds moisture underneath; experienced more wind damage than any other tarp and was completely shredded; sun exposed side also badly damaged

Hay and water protection after 1 year

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD

    did the best job of all the brands, hay looks as good as the day it was covered

  • 2CAMPMAC HD

    held up really well in sunlight, laminated coating appears to block water and sunlight, did a terrific job protecting the hay

  • 3Patiobay

    laminate coating damaged by sunlight but not as bad as Harbor Freight Extreme; wind exposed side looks about as good as new; hay looks really good with no water damage

  • 4Rugged Rhino

    done a fantastic job protecting the hay, looks almost as good as the day it was covered, no visible water damage

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series

    did a great job protecting the hay, looks almost as fresh as the day it was rolled

  • 6Amazon Basics

    sun exposed side held up better than most, wind exposed side held up really well, performed just as well as the CAMPMAC HD at protecting the hay

  • 7Cartman

    described mid-video as looking the best so far with very little hay rot (before later brands were shown); final waterproof-after-1-year test result was a fail

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme

    the light duty Harbor Freight actually held up better on UV than the Extreme; the Extreme's laminated coating is completely destroyed although the wind exposed side is still in very good condition; light duty protected the hay better in some areas than the Extreme

  • 9Zuperia

    faded but held up well to UV exposure; described as looking very porous and likely not blocking water; did not hold back water and caused quite a bit of hay damage

  • 10Grizzly

    allowed a lot of water and sunlight damage to the hay, described as in pretty bad shape

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty

    allowed water to penetrate the hay in several areas, some minor hay rot

  • 12Foremost Dry Top

    allowed a lot more water exposure and a lot more hay rot compared to the Harbor Freight Light Duty

  • 13VEVOR

    letting a lot of water through; at the point it was covered, described as having caused the most hay rot of the brands shown so far

  • 14Foremost Cut

    obviously allowed a lot of UV and water exposure, outer layer of hay beginning to rot

Grommet strength, new (lbs of force)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    326.41st

    first place by a wide margin, described as running circles around the competition

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    89.9

    described as the grommet giving up early despite terrific wind and UV durability

  • 3Patiobay
    approximately2502nd

    (stated as just under 250 lbs, about four times the Amazon Basics eyelet strength); finished second place overall in that test at 249.8 lbs

  • 4Rugged Rhino
    99.9

    described as not bad for a budget tarp

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    199.83rd

    took the lead over Harbor Freight Extreme, third place overall in that leaderboard

  • 6Amazon Basics
    just under60

    exact figure not stated, described as very lightweight with eyelets that do not offer much strength

  • 7Cartman
    52.9

    about 10 lbs behind the Harbor Freight Light Duty

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    193.9

    briefly took the lead before being overtaken by King-A-Ma-Jigs

  • 9Zuperia
    142

    the only tarp made of a cloth-like material, about 108 lbs less than Patiobay

  • 10Grizzly
    67.83rd

    described as third place at that point in testing

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    63.9
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    81.2

    higher initial eyelet strength than the Harbor Freight Light Duty

  • 13VEVOR
    43.9
  • 14Foremost Cut
    47.6

Tear resistance, UV exposed area after 1 year (lbs of force)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    29.81st
  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    28.82nd
  • 3Patiobay
    7.8
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    16.13rd
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    1.1
  • 6Amazon Basics
    10.8
  • 7Cartman
    13.2

    moved into the lead at the time it was tested

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    10.43rd
  • 9Zuperia
    6.3
  • 10Grizzly
    2.2
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    7.3
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    2.2
  • 13VEVOR
    3.8

    half the strength of the Harbor Freight Light Duty

  • 14Foremost Cut
    0.1

    worst of all 14

Puncture resistance, new (g of force)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    5802nd
  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    3602nd
  • 3Patiobay
    5353rd
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    270
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    245
  • 6Amazon Basics
    235
  • 7Cartman
    195
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    5901st
  • 9Zuperia
    200
  • 10Grizzly
    250
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    210
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    160
  • 13VEVOR
    145
  • 14Foremost Cut
    255
All measurements (12 more)+

Puncture resistance, UV exposed area after 1 year (g of force)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    7051st

    became even harder after a year of UV exposure

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    2753rd
  • 3Patiobay
    3552nd
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    195
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    90
  • 6Amazon Basics
    185
  • 7Cartman
    150
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    75

    dropped sharply after aging

  • 9Zuperia
    105
  • 10Grizzly
    65
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    65
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    30
  • 13VEVOR
    20
  • 14Foremost Cut
    50

UV meter reading, new (microwatts per sq cm, 0 is best)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    0
  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    0
  • 3Patiobay
    0

    started off perfect

  • 4Rugged Rhino
    0
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    0
  • 6Amazon Basics
    0
  • 7Cartman
    1
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    0

    started off very strong

  • 10Grizzly
    22

    worst new-tarp UV blocking of all 14

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    1
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    4
  • 13VEVOR
    3
  • 14Foremost Cut
    3
  • 9Zuperia
    not tested

UV meter reading, after 1 year UV exposure

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    0

    perfect score both new and after a year

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    0

    perfect score

  • 3Patiobay
    1

    performed almost as well after a year

  • 4Rugged Rhino
    0

    one of five brands that completely blocked sunlight both new and after a year

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    0

    earned a perfect score both new and used

  • 6Amazon Basics
    0

    also earned perfect scores both new and used

  • 7Cartman
    5
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    17

    let through quite a bit of radiation after aging

  • 10Grizzly
    34

    worst aged UV blocking of all 14

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    3

    described as still really good

  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    17
  • 13VEVOR
    12
  • 14Foremost Cut
    16
  • 9Zuperia
    not tested

Waterproof after 1 year UV exposure

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD

    pass, holding water

  • 2CAMPMAC HD

    pass, holding water just as well as Rugged Rhino and King-A-Ma-Jigs

  • 3Patiobay

    pass, aced this test

  • 4Rugged Rhino

    pass, the first brand to demonstrate complete waterproofing after a year of UV exposure

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series

    pass, only the second brand to hold water

  • 6Amazon Basics

    pass for the section without a tear; a tear elsewhere in the tarp is implied since it is described as holding water only where untorn

  • 7Cartman

    fail, also leaking pretty badly

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme

    fail, also leaking pretty badly

  • 9Zuperia

    fail, leaking water pretty badly

  • 10Grizzly

    fail, leaking pretty badly, just like the VEVOR

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty

    fail, water is passing right through

  • 12Foremost Dry Top

    fail, leaking a lot worse than the Harbor Freight Light Duty

  • 13VEVOR

    fail, leaking pretty badly

  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

Early condition

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD

    still in very good condition with no visible damage from UV or wind

  • 2CAMPMAC HD

    looks pretty good from a distance, but up close the vinyl coating appears to be breaking down

  • 3Patiobay

    holding up nicely to wind, UV exposure has caused some damage to the vinyl coating

  • 4Rugged Rhino

    definitely holding up the best so far; sun and wind exposed sides both still in good condition

  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series

    holding up quite a bit better than the Harbor Freight Extreme, no visible damage from sun or wind

  • 6Amazon Basics

    beginning to show some damage on the sun exposed side, wind exposed side still looks pretty good

  • 7Cartman

    holding up to the wind just fine, sun exposed side beginning to break down in some areas

  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme

    wind exposed side holding up well; sun exposed coating breaking down a lot worse than the Harbor Freight Light Duty

  • 9Zuperia

    looks faded, but no visible structural damage from wind or UV exposure

  • 10Grizzly

    not looking so tough, sun exposed side beginning to crack and fade

  • 13VEVOR

    sun exposed side did not age well and is beginning to break down; wind exposed side is totally shredded

  • 14Foremost Cut

    in even worse condition than the VEVOR; wind exposed side completely shredded

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    not tested
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    not tested

UV resistance rating (1 to X scale, 1 is best)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    1

    best possible rating, tied with CAMPMAC HD and Zuperia

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    1

    best possible rating

  • 4Rugged Rhino
    1.5
  • 9Zuperia
    1

    best possible rating, tied with CAMPMAC HD and CAMPMAC Super HD

  • 3Patiobay
    not tested
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    not tested
  • 6Amazon Basics
    not tested
  • 7Cartman
    not tested
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    not tested
  • 10Grizzly
    not tested
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    not tested
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    not tested
  • 13VEVOR
    not tested
  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

Overall average finish (1st to 14th place ranking averaged across all tests)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    1.41st

    first place overall

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    2.62nd

    second place overall

  • 3Patiobay
    2.93rd

    third place overall

  • 4Rugged Rhino
    not tested
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    not tested
  • 6Amazon Basics
    not tested
  • 7Cartman
    not tested
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    not tested
  • 9Zuperia
    not tested
  • 10Grizzly
    not tested
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    not tested
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    not tested
  • 13VEVOR
    not tested
  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

Tear resistance, new tarp (lbs of force)

  • 3Patiobay
    74.92nd
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    90.61st
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    70.63rd
  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    not tested
  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    not tested
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    not tested
  • 6Amazon Basics
    not tested
  • 7Cartman
    not tested
  • 9Zuperia
    not tested
  • 10Grizzly
    not tested
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    not tested
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    not tested
  • 13VEVOR
    not tested
  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

Early condition (about 4 months)

  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty

    still looking pretty good

  • 12Foremost Dry Top

    did not age well

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    not tested
  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    not tested
  • 3Patiobay
    not tested
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    not tested
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    not tested
  • 6Amazon Basics
    not tested
  • 7Cartman
    not tested
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    not tested
  • 9Zuperia
    not tested
  • 10Grizzly
    not tested
  • 13VEVOR
    not tested
  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

Water protection rating (1 to X scale, 1 is best)

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    1

    best possible rating; five other unnamed brands scored 1.5

  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    not tested
  • 3Patiobay
    not tested
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    not tested
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    not tested
  • 6Amazon Basics
    not tested
  • 7Cartman
    not tested
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    not tested
  • 9Zuperia
    not tested
  • 10Grizzly
    not tested
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    not tested
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    not tested
  • 13VEVOR
    not tested
  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

UV meter reading, new

  • 9Zuperia

    no exact reading given; described as a porous material that allows sunlight through when new

  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    not tested
  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    not tested
  • 3Patiobay
    not tested
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    not tested
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    not tested
  • 6Amazon Basics
    not tested
  • 7Cartman
    not tested
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    not tested
  • 10Grizzly
    not tested
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    not tested
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    not tested
  • 13VEVOR
    not tested
  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

UV meter reading, after 1 year UV exposure (microwatts per sq cm)

  • 9Zuperia
    14
  • 1CAMPMAC Super HD
    not tested
  • 2CAMPMAC HD
    not tested
  • 3Patiobay
    not tested
  • 4Rugged Rhino
    not tested
  • 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
    not tested
  • 6Amazon Basics
    not tested
  • 7Cartman
    not tested
  • 8Harbor Freight Extreme
    not tested
  • 10Grizzly
    not tested
  • 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
    not tested
  • 12Foremost Dry Top
    not tested
  • 13VEVOR
    not tested
  • 14Foremost Cut
    not tested

How it was tested

  • 1 year outdoor exposure: tarps secured over hay bales with one side facing south into direct sunlight and the other facing prevailing wind, checked periodically over roughly a year for visible sun and wind damage
  • hay condition and water protection assessment after roughly 1 year of outdoor exposure
  • subjective 1 to X UV resistance rating and 1 to X water protection rating assigned to some brands after the 1 year exposure (only some brands given explicit numeric ratings)
  • grommet or eyelet strength test measured in pounds of force, on brand new tarps
  • tear resistance test measured in pounds of force, on the UV exposed area of the tarps after 1 year of aging
  • tear resistance test measured in pounds of force, on brand new tarps (only top 3 results given individually)
  • UV meter test measuring UV penetration in microwatts per square centimeter, on brand new tarps and on the UV exposed area after 1 year
  • waterproofing test, on brand new tarps (all passed) and on the UV exposed area after 1 year
  • puncture resistance test using a pick, measured in grams of force, on brand new tarps and on the UV exposed area after 1 year
  • overall ranking: raw scores from all tests converted into a 1st to 14th place ranking and averaged per brand

It's definitely by far the best tarp and it should last for many years

From the test video verdict.
Data notes and caveats

Unusually clean transcript for a 14 product showdown, with repeated leaderboard recap sentences that let almost every number be cross checked. Only the top 3 (CAMPMAC Super HD, CAMPMAC HD, Patiobay) received an explicit numeric overall average finish, plus Rugged Rhino explicitly framed as the budget pick; the products array orders the remaining 10 brands by the extraction worker's reading of their aggregate performance across the individual sub tests, which is not a ranking the video itself states, so treat positions 5 through 14 as approximate. The wind resistance rating and the water protection 1.5 rating for five brands were given only in aggregate ('over half the tarps', 'five other brands') without naming which brands, so those numeric ratings were not assigned to any specific product per the verbatim or omit rule.

More Home & Cleaning