
Which Tarps Brand Wins?
In our test we compared 14 tarps options head to head. CAMPMAC Super HD came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.

CAMPMAC Super HD
Price shown in test: $50
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

CAMPMAC HD
Price shown in test: $50
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Rugged Rhino
Price shown in test: $26 for two tarps, or $13 each
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The quick take
The short version of why each pick lands where it does, built straight from the measured results.
“It's definitely by far the best tarp and it should last for many years”
Best in 6 of 11 measurements, including UV resistance rating, Water protection rating and Grommet strength, new.
Best in 6 of 11 measurements, including UV resistance rating, Water protection rating and Grommet strength, new.
Placed top three in 1 of 9 measurements.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Products are listed in the order they finished.
Claimed thickness
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD
not stated as a mil rating; claims waterproof, UV resistant, dust resistant, tear resistant, all weather, wear proof
- 2CAMPMAC HD12 mil
(claimed), metal grommets every 20 in
- 3Patiobay14 mil
(claimed), brass grommets, rip and tear proof, reinforced edges, UV resistant
- 4Rugged Rhino5 mil
(claimed), waterproof with extreme protection in all weather
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series10 mil
(claimed), all weather, tear and fade resistant, double laminated, grommets every 18 in
- 6Amazon Basics
not stated as a mil rating; claims designed for camping, waterproof design, durable ripstop fabric, reinforced corners and edges
- 7Cartman8 mil
(claimed), waterproof, rip and tear resistant, UV resistant, strong grommets
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme12 mil
(claimed), 14 by 14 tightly woven strands per square inch, superior tensile strength and tear resistance
- 9Zuperia
not stated as a mil rating; claims waterproof, repellent, breathable, ideal for covering anything outdoors
- 10Grizzly5 mil
(claimed), true 8 by 8 weave, waterproof, mildew proof, washable
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty4 mil
(claimed); rust resistant grommets, rot and tear resistant, claims to be waterproof
- 12Foremost Dry Top7 mil
(claimed); rust resistant aluminum grommets approximately every 3 ft; quality rated between good and best
- 13VEVOR5 mil
(claimed), advertised as 10 by 12 ft, claims UV protection and strong waterproofing, marketed as tough tools for half the price
- 14Foremost Cut
not stated as a mil rating; claims rip resistant woven fabric, good quality
Weight
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD6,710 g
by far the heaviest of all 14 tarps
- 2CAMPMAC HD2,008 g
- 3Patiobay2,190 g
heaviest of the first 12 tarps introduced
- 4Rugged Rhino1,196 g
heaviest yet at the point it was introduced
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series1,956 g
- 6Amazon Basics1,038 g
- 7Cartman1,094 g
heaviest yet at the point it was introduced
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme2,130 g
by far the heaviest of the first 12 tarps introduced
- 9Zuperia4,192 g
- 10Grizzly796 g
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty1,048 g
- 12Foremost Dry Top878 g
- 13VEVOR754 g
very light
- 14Foremost Cut702 g
Country of origin
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD
China
- 2CAMPMAC HD
China
- 3Patiobay
China
- 4Rugged Rhino
China
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
China
- 6Amazon Basics
China
- 7Cartman
China
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme
China
- 9Zuperia
China
- 10Grizzly
Vietnam
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
China
- 12Foremost Dry Top
Vietnam
- 13VEVOR
China
- 14Foremost Cut
Vietnam
Condition near 1 year
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD
holding up very well from the wind as well as the UV exposure
- 2CAMPMAC HD
looking great on the wind exposed side; the sun exposed side is beginning to experience cracks in the vinyl coating
- 3Patiobay
holding up well from wind, but direct sunlight caused even more damage than the Amazon Basics; coating rubbing away very easily
- 4Rugged Rhino
definitely doing the best so far, looks almost as good as new on both sun and wind exposed sides
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
still holding up better than the Harbor Freight Extreme, but feeling a little more gritty as the vinyl coating is at the early stages of breaking down
- 6Amazon Basics
feels nice and smooth on the wind exposed side, but the sun exposed side is feeling pretty gritty as the vinyl coating breaks down
- 7Cartman
performed about the same as the Harbor Freight Light Duty for sun exposure; held up really well to wind but has a hole from rubbing against hay stubble
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme
holding up very well to wind, but sun exposure causing a tremendous amount of damage to the coating
- 9Zuperia
other than some additional fading, still looks good on both sides
- 10Grizzly
still not looking too tough, breaking down pretty badly from UV exposure; wind exposed side held up fairly well but appears to be breaking down
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
a few tears, beginning to break down from UV exposure; wind exposed side held up fairly well; a few tiny holes
- 12Foremost Dry Top
continued to hold up well from wind, but UV exposure caused severe cracking in the vinyl coating as well as some holes
- 13VEVOR
less than 6 months old but looks several years old on both sides; a massive hole has formed and the vinyl coating is badly damaged
- 14Foremost Cut
in by far the worst shape of all 14 tarps, described as probably worse than not having a tarp at all since it holds moisture underneath; experienced more wind damage than any other tarp and was completely shredded; sun exposed side also badly damaged
Hay and water protection after 1 year
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD
did the best job of all the brands, hay looks as good as the day it was covered
- 2CAMPMAC HD
held up really well in sunlight, laminated coating appears to block water and sunlight, did a terrific job protecting the hay
- 3Patiobay
laminate coating damaged by sunlight but not as bad as Harbor Freight Extreme; wind exposed side looks about as good as new; hay looks really good with no water damage
- 4Rugged Rhino
done a fantastic job protecting the hay, looks almost as good as the day it was covered, no visible water damage
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
did a great job protecting the hay, looks almost as fresh as the day it was rolled
- 6Amazon Basics
sun exposed side held up better than most, wind exposed side held up really well, performed just as well as the CAMPMAC HD at protecting the hay
- 7Cartman
described mid-video as looking the best so far with very little hay rot (before later brands were shown); final waterproof-after-1-year test result was a fail
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme
the light duty Harbor Freight actually held up better on UV than the Extreme; the Extreme's laminated coating is completely destroyed although the wind exposed side is still in very good condition; light duty protected the hay better in some areas than the Extreme
- 9Zuperia
faded but held up well to UV exposure; described as looking very porous and likely not blocking water; did not hold back water and caused quite a bit of hay damage
- 10Grizzly
allowed a lot of water and sunlight damage to the hay, described as in pretty bad shape
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
allowed water to penetrate the hay in several areas, some minor hay rot
- 12Foremost Dry Top
allowed a lot more water exposure and a lot more hay rot compared to the Harbor Freight Light Duty
- 13VEVOR
letting a lot of water through; at the point it was covered, described as having caused the most hay rot of the brands shown so far
- 14Foremost Cut
obviously allowed a lot of UV and water exposure, outer layer of hay beginning to rot
Grommet strength, new (lbs of force)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD326.41st
first place by a wide margin, described as running circles around the competition
- 2CAMPMAC HD89.9
described as the grommet giving up early despite terrific wind and UV durability
- 3Patiobayapproximately2502nd
(stated as just under 250 lbs, about four times the Amazon Basics eyelet strength); finished second place overall in that test at 249.8 lbs
- 4Rugged Rhino99.9
described as not bad for a budget tarp
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series199.83rd
took the lead over Harbor Freight Extreme, third place overall in that leaderboard
- 6Amazon Basicsjust under60
exact figure not stated, described as very lightweight with eyelets that do not offer much strength
- 7Cartman52.9
about 10 lbs behind the Harbor Freight Light Duty
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme193.9
briefly took the lead before being overtaken by King-A-Ma-Jigs
- 9Zuperia142
the only tarp made of a cloth-like material, about 108 lbs less than Patiobay
- 10Grizzly67.83rd
described as third place at that point in testing
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty63.9
- 12Foremost Dry Top81.2
higher initial eyelet strength than the Harbor Freight Light Duty
- 13VEVOR43.9
- 14Foremost Cut47.6
Tear resistance, UV exposed area after 1 year (lbs of force)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD29.81st
- 2CAMPMAC HD28.82nd
- 3Patiobay7.8
- 4Rugged Rhino16.13rd
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series1.1
- 6Amazon Basics10.8
- 7Cartman13.2
moved into the lead at the time it was tested
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme10.43rd
- 9Zuperia6.3
- 10Grizzly2.2
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty7.3
- 12Foremost Dry Top2.2
- 13VEVOR3.8
half the strength of the Harbor Freight Light Duty
- 14Foremost Cut0.1
worst of all 14
Puncture resistance, new (g of force)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD5802nd
- 2CAMPMAC HD3602nd
- 3Patiobay5353rd
- 4Rugged Rhino270
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series245
- 6Amazon Basics235
- 7Cartman195
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme5901st
- 9Zuperia200
- 10Grizzly250
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty210
- 12Foremost Dry Top160
- 13VEVOR145
- 14Foremost Cut255
All measurements (12 more)+
Puncture resistance, UV exposed area after 1 year (g of force)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD7051st
became even harder after a year of UV exposure
- 2CAMPMAC HD2753rd
- 3Patiobay3552nd
- 4Rugged Rhino195
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series90
- 6Amazon Basics185
- 7Cartman150
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme75
dropped sharply after aging
- 9Zuperia105
- 10Grizzly65
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty65
- 12Foremost Dry Top30
- 13VEVOR20
- 14Foremost Cut50
UV meter reading, new (microwatts per sq cm, 0 is best)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD0
- 2CAMPMAC HD0
- 3Patiobay0
started off perfect
- 4Rugged Rhino0
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series0
- 6Amazon Basics0
- 7Cartman1
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme0
started off very strong
- 10Grizzly22
worst new-tarp UV blocking of all 14
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty1
- 12Foremost Dry Top4
- 13VEVOR3
- 14Foremost Cut3
- 9Zuperianot tested
UV meter reading, after 1 year UV exposure
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD0
perfect score both new and after a year
- 2CAMPMAC HD0
perfect score
- 3Patiobay1
performed almost as well after a year
- 4Rugged Rhino0
one of five brands that completely blocked sunlight both new and after a year
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series0
earned a perfect score both new and used
- 6Amazon Basics0
also earned perfect scores both new and used
- 7Cartman5
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme17
let through quite a bit of radiation after aging
- 10Grizzly34
worst aged UV blocking of all 14
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty3
described as still really good
- 12Foremost Dry Top17
- 13VEVOR12
- 14Foremost Cut16
- 9Zuperianot tested
Waterproof after 1 year UV exposure
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD
pass, holding water
- 2CAMPMAC HD
pass, holding water just as well as Rugged Rhino and King-A-Ma-Jigs
- 3Patiobay
pass, aced this test
- 4Rugged Rhino
pass, the first brand to demonstrate complete waterproofing after a year of UV exposure
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
pass, only the second brand to hold water
- 6Amazon Basics
pass for the section without a tear; a tear elsewhere in the tarp is implied since it is described as holding water only where untorn
- 7Cartman
fail, also leaking pretty badly
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme
fail, also leaking pretty badly
- 9Zuperia
fail, leaking water pretty badly
- 10Grizzly
fail, leaking pretty badly, just like the VEVOR
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
fail, water is passing right through
- 12Foremost Dry Top
fail, leaking a lot worse than the Harbor Freight Light Duty
- 13VEVOR
fail, leaking pretty badly
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
Early condition
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD
still in very good condition with no visible damage from UV or wind
- 2CAMPMAC HD
looks pretty good from a distance, but up close the vinyl coating appears to be breaking down
- 3Patiobay
holding up nicely to wind, UV exposure has caused some damage to the vinyl coating
- 4Rugged Rhino
definitely holding up the best so far; sun and wind exposed sides both still in good condition
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series
holding up quite a bit better than the Harbor Freight Extreme, no visible damage from sun or wind
- 6Amazon Basics
beginning to show some damage on the sun exposed side, wind exposed side still looks pretty good
- 7Cartman
holding up to the wind just fine, sun exposed side beginning to break down in some areas
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme
wind exposed side holding up well; sun exposed coating breaking down a lot worse than the Harbor Freight Light Duty
- 9Zuperia
looks faded, but no visible structural damage from wind or UV exposure
- 10Grizzly
not looking so tough, sun exposed side beginning to crack and fade
- 13VEVOR
sun exposed side did not age well and is beginning to break down; wind exposed side is totally shredded
- 14Foremost Cut
in even worse condition than the VEVOR; wind exposed side completely shredded
- 11Harbor Freight Light Dutynot tested
- 12Foremost Dry Topnot tested
UV resistance rating (1 to X scale, 1 is best)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD1
best possible rating, tied with CAMPMAC HD and Zuperia
- 2CAMPMAC HD1
best possible rating
- 4Rugged Rhino1.5
- 9Zuperia1
best possible rating, tied with CAMPMAC HD and CAMPMAC Super HD
- 3Patiobaynot tested
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Seriesnot tested
- 6Amazon Basicsnot tested
- 7Cartmannot tested
- 8Harbor Freight Extremenot tested
- 10Grizzlynot tested
- 11Harbor Freight Light Dutynot tested
- 12Foremost Dry Topnot tested
- 13VEVORnot tested
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
Overall average finish (1st to 14th place ranking averaged across all tests)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD1.41st
first place overall
- 2CAMPMAC HD2.62nd
second place overall
- 3Patiobay2.93rd
third place overall
- 4Rugged Rhinonot tested
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Seriesnot tested
- 6Amazon Basicsnot tested
- 7Cartmannot tested
- 8Harbor Freight Extremenot tested
- 9Zuperianot tested
- 10Grizzlynot tested
- 11Harbor Freight Light Dutynot tested
- 12Foremost Dry Topnot tested
- 13VEVORnot tested
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
Tear resistance, new tarp (lbs of force)
- 3Patiobay74.92nd
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Series90.61st
- 8Harbor Freight Extreme70.63rd
- 1CAMPMAC Super HDnot tested
- 2CAMPMAC HDnot tested
- 4Rugged Rhinonot tested
- 6Amazon Basicsnot tested
- 7Cartmannot tested
- 9Zuperianot tested
- 10Grizzlynot tested
- 11Harbor Freight Light Dutynot tested
- 12Foremost Dry Topnot tested
- 13VEVORnot tested
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
Early condition (about 4 months)
- 11Harbor Freight Light Duty
still looking pretty good
- 12Foremost Dry Top
did not age well
- 1CAMPMAC Super HDnot tested
- 2CAMPMAC HDnot tested
- 3Patiobaynot tested
- 4Rugged Rhinonot tested
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Seriesnot tested
- 6Amazon Basicsnot tested
- 7Cartmannot tested
- 8Harbor Freight Extremenot tested
- 9Zuperianot tested
- 10Grizzlynot tested
- 13VEVORnot tested
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
Water protection rating (1 to X scale, 1 is best)
- 1CAMPMAC Super HD1
best possible rating; five other unnamed brands scored 1.5
- 2CAMPMAC HDnot tested
- 3Patiobaynot tested
- 4Rugged Rhinonot tested
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Seriesnot tested
- 6Amazon Basicsnot tested
- 7Cartmannot tested
- 8Harbor Freight Extremenot tested
- 9Zuperianot tested
- 10Grizzlynot tested
- 11Harbor Freight Light Dutynot tested
- 12Foremost Dry Topnot tested
- 13VEVORnot tested
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
UV meter reading, new
- 9Zuperia
no exact reading given; described as a porous material that allows sunlight through when new
- 1CAMPMAC Super HDnot tested
- 2CAMPMAC HDnot tested
- 3Patiobaynot tested
- 4Rugged Rhinonot tested
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Seriesnot tested
- 6Amazon Basicsnot tested
- 7Cartmannot tested
- 8Harbor Freight Extremenot tested
- 10Grizzlynot tested
- 11Harbor Freight Light Dutynot tested
- 12Foremost Dry Topnot tested
- 13VEVORnot tested
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
UV meter reading, after 1 year UV exposure (microwatts per sq cm)
- 9Zuperia14
- 1CAMPMAC Super HDnot tested
- 2CAMPMAC HDnot tested
- 3Patiobaynot tested
- 4Rugged Rhinonot tested
- 5King-A-Ma-Jigs Pro Seriesnot tested
- 6Amazon Basicsnot tested
- 7Cartmannot tested
- 8Harbor Freight Extremenot tested
- 10Grizzlynot tested
- 11Harbor Freight Light Dutynot tested
- 12Foremost Dry Topnot tested
- 13VEVORnot tested
- 14Foremost Cutnot tested
How it was tested
- 1 year outdoor exposure: tarps secured over hay bales with one side facing south into direct sunlight and the other facing prevailing wind, checked periodically over roughly a year for visible sun and wind damage
- hay condition and water protection assessment after roughly 1 year of outdoor exposure
- subjective 1 to X UV resistance rating and 1 to X water protection rating assigned to some brands after the 1 year exposure (only some brands given explicit numeric ratings)
- grommet or eyelet strength test measured in pounds of force, on brand new tarps
- tear resistance test measured in pounds of force, on the UV exposed area of the tarps after 1 year of aging
- tear resistance test measured in pounds of force, on brand new tarps (only top 3 results given individually)
- UV meter test measuring UV penetration in microwatts per square centimeter, on brand new tarps and on the UV exposed area after 1 year
- waterproofing test, on brand new tarps (all passed) and on the UV exposed area after 1 year
- puncture resistance test using a pick, measured in grams of force, on brand new tarps and on the UV exposed area after 1 year
- overall ranking: raw scores from all tests converted into a 1st to 14th place ranking and averaged per brand
“It's definitely by far the best tarp and it should last for many years”
Data notes and caveats
Unusually clean transcript for a 14 product showdown, with repeated leaderboard recap sentences that let almost every number be cross checked. Only the top 3 (CAMPMAC Super HD, CAMPMAC HD, Patiobay) received an explicit numeric overall average finish, plus Rugged Rhino explicitly framed as the budget pick; the products array orders the remaining 10 brands by the extraction worker's reading of their aggregate performance across the individual sub tests, which is not a ranking the video itself states, so treat positions 5 through 14 as approximate. The wind resistance rating and the water protection 1.5 rating for five brands were given only in aggregate ('over half the tarps', 'five other brands') without naming which brands, so those numeric ratings were not assigned to any specific product per the verbatim or omit rule.


